CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 251Advanced Welding Techniques AnalysisAluminum Alloy Microstructure PropertiesWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Influence of friction stir welding parameters on grain size and formability in 5083 aluminum alloy

Hirata, Tomotake, Oguri, Taizo, Hagino, Hideki, Tanaka, Tsutomu, Chung, Sung Wook, Takigawa, Yorinobu, Higashi, Kenji·2007·Materials Science and Engineering: A
DOI 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.079
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.079

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Dawes, 1996, Weld. J., 75, 41
  2. Tsujikawa, 2004, Mater. Trans., 45, 419, 10.2320/matertrans.45.419 · DOI
  3. Sato, 2001, Metall. Mater. Trans., 32A, 3023, 10.1007/s11661-001-0177-8 · DOI
  4. Liu, 2003, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 22, 441, 10.1023/A:1022959627794 · DOI
  5. Nakata, 2000, ISIJ Int., 40, S15, 10.2355/isijinternational.40.Suppl_S15 · DOI
  6. Liu, 2004, Mater. Trans., 45, 2665, 10.2320/matertrans.45.2665 · DOI
  7. Sato, 2003, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 354, 298, 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00008-X · DOI
  8. Mochizuki, 2004, ASME PVP (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press Vessels Pip. Div.), 474, 17
  9. Nakai, 2004, Kobe Steel Eng. Rep. (Jpn.), 54, 62
  10. Sato, 2001, Metall. Mater. Trans., 32A, 3033, 10.1007/s11661-001-0178-7 · DOI
  11. Jata, 2000, Scr. Mater., 43, 743, 10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00480-2 · DOI
  12. Heinz, 2002, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 33A, 489, 10.1007/s11663-002-0059-5 · DOI
  13. Charit, 2003, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 359, 290, 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00367-8 · DOI
  14. Wilson, 1986, Metall. Trans., 17A, 367, 10.1007/BF02643919 · DOI
  15. Hall, 1951, Proc. Phys. Soc. B, 64, 747, 10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 · DOI
  16. Petch, 1953, J. Iron Steel Inst., 174, 25
  17. Sato, 2004, Scr. Mater., 50, 57, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.037 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hirata, T., Oguri, T., Hagino, H., Tanaka, T., Chung, S. W., Takigawa, Y., & Higashi, K.
Affiliations
  • Technology Research Institute of Osaka Prefecture (JP)
  • Osaka Prefecture University (JP)
Corresponding author
Hirata, Tomotake
ORCID
Venue
Materials Science and Engineering: A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
456
Issue
1-2
Pages
344-349
ISSN
0921-5093 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.079
OpenAlex
W1973218847
Cited by
251
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
12.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Materials Science and Engineering A (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Keywords
friction stir welding, 5083 aluminum alloy, grain refinement, formability, ductility, stir zone microstructure, welding parameters, equiaxed grains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review