Cited by 206biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Relevance of PEG in PLA-based blends for tissue engineering 3D-printed scaffolds

Open access
Serra, Tiziano, Ortiz-Hernandez, Monica, Engel, Elisabeth, Planell, Josep A., Navarro, Melba·2014·Materials Science and Engineering: C

Abstract

Achieving high quality 3D-printed structures requires establishing the right printing conditions. Finding processing conditions that satisfy both the fabrication process and the final required scaffold properties is crucial. This work stresses the importance of studying the outcome of the plasticizing effect of PEG on PLA-based blends used for the fabrication of 3D-direct-printed scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. For this, PLA/PEG blends with 5, 10 and 20% (w/w) of PEG and PLA/PEG/bioactive CaP glass composites were processed in the form of 3D rapid prototyping scaffolds. Surface analysis and differential scanning calorimetry revealed a rearrangement of polymer chains and a topography, wettability and elastic modulus increase of the studied surfaces as PEG was incorporated. Moreover, addition of 10 and 20% PEG led to non-uniform 3D structures with lower mechanical properties. In vitro degradation studies showed that the inclusion of PEG significantly accelerated the degradation rate of the material. Results indicated that the presence of PEG not only improves PLA processing but also leads to relevant surface, geometrical and structural changes including modulation of the degradation rate of PLA-based 3D printed scaffolds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This type of material could be adjusted for 3D printing technology, and thus achieve the engineering of patient-tailored bone grafts.

    “It means that this type of material could be adjusted for 3D printing technology, and thus achieve the engineering of patient-tailored bone grafts [173,174,175].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serra, T., Ortiz-Hernandez, M., Engel, E., Planell, J. A., & Navarro, M.
Affiliations
Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (ES)
Corresponding author
Navarro, Melba
Venue
Materials Science and Engineering: C
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
38
Pages
55-62
ISSN
0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039455261
Cited by
206
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Keywords
polyethylene glycol, polylactic acid, 3D-printed scaffolds, tissue engineering scaffolds, plasticization, wettability, surface topography, elastic modulus, scaffold degradation, mechanical properties, polymer blends
MeSH terms
Interferometry, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Polyesters, Polyethylene Glycols, Polymers, Temperature, Porosity, Microscopy, Atomic Force, Lactic Acid, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Mechanical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review