The electrostimulation and scar inhibition effect of chitosan/oxidized hydroxyethyl cellulose/reduced graphene oxide/asiaticoside liposome based hydrogel on peripheral nerve regeneration in vitro
Abstract
The application of hollow nerve conduits in the repair of peripheral nerve defects is effected by inferior recovery, and nerve extension is hampered by the scar tissue generated during the repair process. In this study, the filler in hollow nerve conduit, chitosan/oxidized hydroxyethyl cellulose (CS/OHEC) hydrogel loaded asiaticoside liposome and the conductive reduced graphene oxide (rGO) were developed and used to reform the microenvironment for peripheral nerve regeneration. The physiochemical properties of CS/OHEC/rGO/asiaticoside liposome hydrogel were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and compressive modulus, porosity, swelling ratio, degradation and conductivity. In addition, the asiaticoside release profiles in vitro were investigated. The hydrogel had a continuous porous network structure with pore size distribution in the range of 50-250 μm. The majority of the hydrogels had porosities above 70%, and a compressive modulus of 0.45 MPa. The weight loss rate of hydrogel reached 76.14 ± 4.45% within 8 weeks. The conductivity of the hydrogel was 5.27 ± 0.42 × 10-4 S/cm. The hydrogel was non-toxic and suitable for adhesion and proliferation of nerve cells in vitro. In addition, the application of electrical stimulation after the addition of rGO can promote the differentiation and proliferation of nerve cells, accelerating nerve regeneration. The asiaticoside released from the hydrogel had a significant inhibitory effect on the growth and collagen secretion of fibroblasts, eliminating scars for regenerative nerves, which can promote the function recovery of defected peripheral nerve. Together, these positive results indicate that the hydrogel would be a promising candidate for peripheral nerve regeneration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Thermoresponsive and graphene oxide-integrated liposomal hydrogels have demonstrated electrostimulation responsiveness and scar reduction.
“Thermoresponsive and graphene oxide–integrated liposomal hydrogels have demonstrated additional functionalities such as electrostimulation responsiveness and scar reduction (Zheng et al. 2020).”
From Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. in skin health and cosmeceuticals: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and advanced delivery systems (2025) · cites this paper as Zheng et al. 2020
HRIPT and patch testing of chitosan-based microneedles and graphene oxide liposomal gels did not elicit adverse dermal responses in animal models or preliminary human use.
“For instance, HRIPT and patch testing of chitosan-based microneedles and graphene oxide liposomal gels did not elicit adverse dermal responses in animal models or preliminary human use (Ryall et al. 2022; Zheng et al. 2020).”
From Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. in skin health and cosmeceuticals: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and advanced delivery systems (2025) · cites this paper as Zheng et al. 2020
Current studies report no enhanced irritation with new-generation delivery systems.
“Current studies report no enhanced irritation with such vehicles.”
From Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. in skin health and cosmeceuticals: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and advanced delivery systems (2025) · cites this paper as Zheng et al. 2020
Cites
Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration
Gu, X., Ding, F., & Williams, D. F. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.064 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Handayani, R., Febriyanti, R. M., Muhaimin, M., & Chearunisaa, A. Y. (2025) · Pharmacia · doi:10.3897/pharmacia.72.e167217 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zheng, F., Li, R., He, Q., Koral, K., Tao, J., Fan, L., Xiang, R., Ma, J., Wang, N., Yin, Y., Huang, Z., Xu, P., & Xu, H.
- Affiliations
- Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, Peihu
- Xu, Haixing
- Venue
- Materials Science and Engineering: C
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 109
- Pages
- 110560
- ISSN
- 0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2995593186
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51572206)
- Wuhan University of Technology (20191049715005, 20191049715011, 20191049715012)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Keywords
- peripheral nerve regeneration, nerve conduits, hydrogels, chitosan, reduced graphene oxide, asiaticoside, liposomes, electrical stimulation, drug release, conductive hydrogels
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cellulose, Cicatrix, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Graphite, Liposomes, Nerve Regeneration, Peripheral Nerves, Triterpenes, Hydrogels, NIH 3T3 Cells, Chitosan, Mice, Peripheral Nerve Injuries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review