Cited by 788Cellular and Composite StructuresAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Architected cellular materials: A review on their mechanical properties towards fatigue-tolerant design and fabrication

Open access
Benedetti, M., du Plessis, A., Ritchie, R.O., Dallago, M., Razavi, N., Berto, F.·2021·Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports

Abstract

Additive manufacturing of industrially-relevant high-performance parts and products is today a reality, especially for metal additive manufacturing technologies. The design complexity that is now possible makes it particularly useful to improve product performance in a variety of applications. Metal additive manufacturing is especially well matured and is being used for production of end-use mission-critical parts. The next level of this development includes the use of intentionally designed porous metals - architected cellular or lattice structures. Cellular structures can be designed or tailored for specific mechanical or other performance characteristics and have numerous advantages due to their large surface area, low mass, regular repeated structure and open interconnected pore spaces. This is considered particularly useful for medical implants and for lightweight automotive and aerospace components, which are the main industry drivers at present. Architected cellular structures behave similar to open cell foams, which have found many other industrial applications to date, such as sandwich panels for impact absorption, radiators for thermal management, filters or catalyst materials, sound insulation, amongst others. The advantage of additively manufactured cellular structures is the precise control of the micro-architecture which becomes possible. The huge potential of these porous architected cellular materials manufactured by additive manufacturing is currently limited by concerns over their structural integrity. This is a valid concern, when considering the complexity of the manufacturing process, and the only recent maturation of metal additive manufacturing technologies. Many potential manufacturing errors can occur, which have so far resulted in a widely disparate set of results in the literature for these types of structures, with especially poor fatigue properties often found. These have improved over the years, matching the maturation and improvement of the metal additive manufacturing processes. As the causes of errors and effects of these on mechanical properties are now better understood, many of the underlying issues can be removed or mitigated. This makes additively manufactured cellular structures a highly valid option for disruptive new and improved industrial products. This review paper discusses the progress to date in the improvement of the fatigue performance of cellular structures manufactured by additive manufacturing, especially metal-based, providing insights and a glimpse to the future for fatigue-tolerant additively manufactured architected cellular materials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mser.2021.100606

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manufacturing errors and the overall choice of cellular geometry influence the fatigue performance of lattice structures.

    “These manufacturing errors and the overall choice of cellular geometry influence the fatigue performance of such structures, which is key for their use in aerospace and is discussed in more detail in [108].”

    From Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [108]

  • TO techniques for AM applications can be further improved by shelling components to further reduce the mass, but this presents the challenges of internal voids which require internal support structures for any overhanging sections and can trap unprocessed powder increasing mass.

    “TO techniques for AM applications can be further improved by shelling components to further reduce the mass, but this presents the challenges of internal voids which require internal support structures for any overhanging sections and can trap unprocessed powder increasing mass [108,112].”

    From Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [108]

  • Lattice structures have numerous design and manufacturing constraints that need attention, limiting their application so far.

    “While there is a lot of potential for these structures, they have numerous design and manufacturing constraints that need attention, limiting their application so far, this is discussed in depth in [108].”

    From Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [108]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benedetti, M., du Plessis, A., Ritchie, R. O., Dallago, M., Razavi, N., & Berto, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Berto, F.
Venue
Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
144
Pages
100606
ISSN
0927-796X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120338085
Cited by
788
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 151 · 2025: 167 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 158 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 66
FWCI
50.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials Science and Engineering R Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Cellular and Composite Structures
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Keywords
lattice structures, metal additive manufacturing, fatigue behavior, porous metals, open-cell foams, manufacturing errors, mechanical properties, lightweight components, biomedical implants, aerospace components, automotive components

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review