The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the modifications and applications of highly stable porous frameworks via UiO-66
Abstract
Abstract Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been one of the most intensely studied family of hybrid porous crystalline materials for decades, whose potential applications cover almost all the concerned technological fields ranging from environment, medical, and biology to energy and electronics. However, the low stability of MOFs has been the most crucial weakness of this type of material, hindering its development in many applications not only as pure MOFs but also in the grand field of porous nanomaterials. Fortunately, UiO-66, a zirconium terephthalate–based MOF, is found to possess remarkably uniform and tunable pore sizes, exceptionally high surface areas as well as active Zr-O clusters. It also holds incredible hydrothermal stability even higher than 350°C because of its strong Zr-O bond with high coordination number of Zr(IV), which further offers high resistance to a wide range of solvents. These outstanding qualities have granted UiO-66 and its derived UiOs extraordinarily promising future potentials. Since the very applications of UiO-66 itself are of high values and, more essentially, the high comprehensive properties of UiO-66 can lead researchers to explore and accomplish achievements that no other MOFs can do, it is of vital importance to systematically categorize and analyze the properties and applications of UiO-66 as it is an ideal representative to study the modification and applicable properties of general UiOs, MOFs, and even porous materials. However, no work has been done to summarize MOFs through the perspective of one classic Zr-MOF, namely, UiO-66. Moreover, there is hardly no work on the study of MOFs via the angle from one single branch such as UiOs or ZIFs. Therefore, in this organized review, details of the synthesis, modulation, and functionalization of a series of UiOs, especially those of UiO-66, are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Metal–organic frameworks as platforms for clean energy
Li, S.-L., & Xu, Q. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee40507a · Cited by 970
Cited by
Winarta, J., Shan, B., Mcintyre, S. M., Ye, L., Wang, C., Liu, J., & Mu, B. (2020) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00955 · Cited by 641
UiO-66 metal–organic frameworks in water treatment: A critical review
Ahmadijokani, F., Molavi, H., Rezakazemi, M., Tajahmadi, S., Bahi, A., Ko, F., Aminabhavi, T. M., Li, J.-R., & Arjmand, M. (2022) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100904 · Cited by 559
Felix Sahayaraj, A., Joy Prabu, H., Maniraj, J., Kannan, M., Bharathi, M., Diwahar, P., & Salamon, J. (2023) · Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials · doi:10.1007/s10904-023-02657-1 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Zou, D., & Liu, D.
- Venue
- Materials Today Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 139-165
- ISSN
- 2468-5194 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914294240
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the modifications and applications of highly stable porous frameworks via UiO-66. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.12.004
- The paper
- Zou, D., & Liu, D. (2019). Understanding the modifications and applications of highly stable porous frameworks via UiO-66. Materials Today Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.12.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.