One-way thermo-responsive shape memory polymer nanocomposite derived from polycaprolactone and polystyrene-block-polybutadiene-block-polystyrene packed with carbon nanofiber
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sharp peaks at 21.43 and 23.55° 2θ are due to orthorhombic PCL polymer reflections depicted as (1 1 1) and (2 0 0) crystal planes.
“On the other hand, sharp peaks were also found at 21.43, and 23.55° positions, which could be due to the orthorhombic PCL polymer reflections, which are depicted as (1 1 1) and (2 0 0) crystal planes, respectively.71”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Gopinath, S., Adarsh, N. N., Radhakrishnan Nair, P., & Mathew, S.
- Affiliations
- Mahatma Gandhi University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Adarsh, N.N.
- Mathew, Suresh
- Venue
- Materials Today Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 100802
- ISSN
- 2352-4928 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991064092
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Materials Today Communications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mahatma Gandhi University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
- Keywords
- polycaprolactone, SBS triblock copolymer, carbon nanofibers, polymer blends, thermoresponsive polymers, blend immiscibility, crystallinity, thermal stability, shape recovery, conductive fillers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
