The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated image segmentation of scanning electron microscopy images of graphene using U-Net Neural Network
Abstract
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is one of the most common approaches to the characterization of synthesized 2D materials such as graphene. Images from SEM contain detailed information about crystalline properties, domain size, and nucleation density, but typically are analyzed through a laborious, serial process that relies on the trained eye of synthesis experts. In this work, we demonstrate an image segmentation neural network that automatically distinguishes between pixels in SEM images that correspond to regions where graphene is and is not present. We utilize the U-Net architecture to learn on a training data set of more than 90 pre-labeled images coupled with moderate image augmentation. Comparing the performance of models trained on smaller high fidelity data set to those trained on larger low fidelity data sets, we find that higher quality is more valuable than higher quantity for achieving good performance. When neural network hyperparameters such as batch size and learning rate are properly tuned, the learned model shows an accuracy for classification of over 90% and an F1 score over 80%. The neural network trained on SEM images of graphene shows reasonable performance when directly applied to other 2D materials, suggesting the possibility of use in transfer learning. Detailed analysis of the inner workings of the model reveals that the domain edges are most critical for making classifications when segmenting the image. We also show the use of a post processing t…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Deep-learning procedures based on convolutional neural networks have already been utilized to automate the SEM image analysis. However, such solutions have been practiced mostly in the context of material sciences.61-64”
From SEMTWIST Quantification of Biofilm Infection in Human Chronic Wound Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Machine Learning (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
Shi, J., Ma, D., Han, G.-F., Zhang, Y., Ji, Q., Gao, T., Sun, J., Song, X., Li, C., Zhang, Y., et al. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn503211t · Cited by 459
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Frank, 2007, Mechanical properties of suspended graphene sheets, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 25, 2558, 10.1116/1.2789446 · DOI
- Papageorgiou, 2017, Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites, Prog. Mater. Sci., 90, 75, 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 · DOI
- Cao, 2015, Ultrathin graphene: electrical properties and highly efficient electromagnetic interference shielding, J. Mater. Chem. C, 3, 6589, 10.1039/C5TC01354B · DOI
- Das, 2008, Monitoring dopants by Raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene transistor, Nature Nanotechnol., 3, 210, 10.1038/nnano.2008.67 · DOI
- Avouris, 2010, Graphene: electronic and photonic properties and devices, Nano Lett., 10, 4285, 10.1021/nl102824h · DOI
- Kawamoto, 2017, Green processing of carbon nanomaterials, Adv. Mater., 29, 10.1002/adma.201602423 · DOI
- Neumaier, 2019, Integrating graphene into semiconductor fabrication lines, Nature Mater., 18, 525, 10.1038/s41563-019-0359-7 · DOI
- Lin, 2019, Synthesis challenges for graphene industry, Nature Mater., 18, 520, 10.1038/s41563-019-0341-4 · DOI
- Choi, 2022, Large-scale synthesis of graphene and other 2D materials towards industrialization, Nature Commun., 13, 1, 10.1038/s41467-022-29182-y · DOI
- Li, 2022, Wafer-scale single-crystal monolayer graphene grown on sapphire substrate, Nature Mater., 21, 740, 10.1038/s41563-021-01174-1 · DOI
- Hiura, 2010, Determination of the number of graphene layers: Discrete distribution of the secondary electron intensity stemming from individual graphene layers, Appl. Phys. Express, 3, 10.1143/APEX.3.095101 · DOI
- Han, 2020, Deep-learning-enabled fast optical identification and characterization of 2D materials, Adv. Mater., 32, 10.1002/adma.202000953 · DOI
- Masubuchi, 2020, Deep-learning-based image segmentation integrated with optical microscopy for automatically searching for two-dimensional materials, Npj 2D Mater. Appl., 4, 1, 10.1038/s41699-020-0137-z · DOI
- Zhu, 2022, Artificial neuron networks enabled identification and characterizations of 2D materials and van der waals heterostructures, ACS Nano, 16, 2721, 10.1021/acsnano.1c09644 · DOI
- Dong, 2021, 3D deep learning enables accurate layer mapping of 2d materials, ACS Nano, 15, 3139, 10.1021/acsnano.0c09685 · DOI
- Sterbentz, 2021, Universal image segmentation for optical identification of 2D materials, Sci. Rep., 11, 1, 10.1038/s41598-021-85159-9 · DOI
- He, 2021, Insights into optical detection and three-dimensional characterization of monolayer molybdenum disulfide thin films based on machine learning, Appl. Surf. Sci., 565, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150530 · DOI
- Li, 2021, Quantifying the CVD-grown two-dimensional materials via image clustering, Nanoscale, 13, 15324, 10.1039/D1NR03802H · DOI
- Ushiba, 2021, Deep-learning-based semantic image segmentation of graphene field-effect transistors, Appl. Phys. Express, 14, 10.35848/1882-0786/abe3db · DOI
- Yang, 2022, Modified UNet++ with attention gate for graphene identification by optical microscopy, Carbon, 195, 246, 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.03.035 · DOI
- Sanchez-Juarez, 2022, Automated system for the detection of 2D materials using digital image processing and deep learning, Opt. Mater. Express, 12, 1856, 10.1364/OME.454314 · DOI
- Horwath, 2020, Understanding important features of deep learning models for segmentation of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images, Npj Comput. Mater., 6, 1, 10.1038/s41524-020-00363-x · DOI
- Aziz Ezzat, 2020, Machine learning for revealing spatial dependence among nanoparticles: Understanding catalyst film dewetting via gibbs point process models, J. Phys. Chem. C, 124, 27479, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07765 · DOI
- Faraz, 2022, Deep learning detection of nanoparticles and multiple object tracking of their dynamic evolution during in situ ETEM studies, Sci. Rep., 12, 1, 10.1038/s41598-022-06308-2 · DOI
- Jacobs, 2023, Materials swelling revealed through automated semantic segmentation of cavities in electron microscopy images, Scientific Reports, 13, 5178, 10.1038/s41598-023-32454-2 · DOI
- Shen, 2021, Multi defect detection and analysis of electron microscopy images with deep learning, Comput. Mater. Sci., 199, 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110576 · DOI
- Jacobs, 2022, Performance and limitations of deep learning semantic segmentation of multiple defects in transmission electron micrographs, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci., 3
- Jacobs, 2022, Deep learning object detection in materials science: Current state and future directions, Comput. Mater. Sci., 211, 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111527 · DOI
- Bals, 2023, Deep learning for automated size and shape analysis of nanoparticles in scanning electron microscopy, RSC Adv., 13, 2795, 10.1039/D2RA07812K · DOI · Paper page
- Kavuran, 2021, SEM-Net: Deep features selections with binary particle swarm optimization method for classification of scanning electron microscope images, Mater. Today Commun., 27
- Modarres, 2017, Neural network for nanoscience scanning electron microscope image recognition, Sci. Rep., 7, 1, 10.1038/s41598-017-13565-z · DOI
- Falk, 2019, U-net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry, Nature Methods, 16, 67, 10.1038/s41592-018-0261-2 · DOI
- Cao, 2018, Deep learning and its applications in biomedicine, Genom. Proteom. Bioinform., 16, 17, 10.1016/j.gpb.2017.07.003 · DOI
- Oliveira, 2016, Computational methods for the image segmentation of pigmented skin lesions: a review, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 131, 127, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.03.032 · DOI
- Schiller, 2020, Crowd-sourced data and analysis tools for advancing the chemical vapor deposition of graphene: Implications for manufacturing, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 3, 10144, 10.1021/acsanm.0c02018 · DOI
- de Mariscal, 2021, DeepImageJ: A user-friendly environment to run deep learning models in ImageJ, Nature Methods, 18, 1192, 10.1038/s41592-021-01262-9 · DOI
- Canny, 1986, A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., PAMI-8, 679, 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851 · DOI · Paper page
- J. Matas, C. Galambos, J. Kittler, Progressive Probabilistic Hough Transform, in: British Machine Vision Conference, 1998. · DOI
- Gupta, 2015, Recent development in 2D materials beyond graphene, Prog. Mater. Sci., 73, 44, 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.002 · DOI
- Weiss, 2016, A survey of transfer learning, J. Big Data, 3, 10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Dayhoff, 2001, Artificial neural networks, Cancer, 91, 1615, 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1615::AID-CNCR1175>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
- Marr, 1980, Theory of edge detection, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. Biol. Sci., 207, 187
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singh, S., Muniz De Oliveira, F., Wang, C., Kumar, M., Xuan, Y., DeMazumder, D., Sen, C. K., & Roy, S. (2025) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2024.0291 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, A., Schiller, J. A., Ramos, I., Serrano, J., Adams, D. K., Tawfick, S., & Ertekin, E.
- Venue
- Materials Today Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-06
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 106127
- ISSN
- 2352-4928
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1720701, 1922758, ASC190029, MAT220011)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review