Advances, challenges, and environmental impacts in metal–air battery electrolytes
Open accessAbstract
Efficient energy storage technologies are vital in the current efforts towards decarbonisation. Batteries, as one of the most versatile electrochemical energy storage systems, have the potential to shape the transition from the current climate crisis scenario to a carbon neutral and sustainable future. In particular, metal–air batteries are gaining scientific and industrial interest as promising contenders to the ubiquitous lithium-ion batteries. The electrolyte plays a critical role in metal–air batteries as it determines the battery performance, its safety and the operating lifespan. The low-density, ease of processing, good thermal and electrochemical stability, mechanically stiff but ductile character, electrically insulating properties and tailor-made chemistry make polymers singularly interesting to be applied as a separator/liquid electrolyte pair, gel-electrolytes or solid-electrolytes. Accordingly, in this work the current bottlenecks and challenges in metal–air batteries are presented, with particular emphasis on the electrolyte design. The implementation of aqueous liquid electrolytes, organic liquid electrolytes, polymer membranes soaked in liquid electrolytes, gel-like electrolytes and solid-state electrolytes is discussed and the environmental impacts associated with metal–air batteries are analysed within a Circular Economy perspective. We expect this work can guide future efforts in the development of potentially sustainable next generation metal-air batteries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Solid-state electrolytes allow the thickness of microbatteries to be reduced to micrometers.
“A significant advancement in this area has been the development of solid-state electrolytes, allowing the thickness of these microbatteries to be reduced to mere micrometers.”
From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Salado and Lizundia, 2022
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 194 · Cited by 108
- Authors
- Salado, M., & Lizundia, E.
- Affiliations
- Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures (ES)
- University of the Basque Country (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Salado, Manuel
- Lizundia, Erlantz
- Venue
- Materials Today Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 28
- Pages
- 101064
- ISSN
- 2468-6069 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4281709658
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 194
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Materials Today Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Communities in ADDI (Universidad del Pais Vasco) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced battery technologies research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Keywords
- metal-air batteries, battery electrolytes, polymer electrolytes, gel electrolyte, solid electrolytes, organic liquid electrolytes, polymer membranes, electrolyte design, environmental impact, circular economy, energy storage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review