Cited by 11Inflammation biomarkers and pathwaysSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects

Major open abdominal surgery is associated with increased levels of endothelial damage and interleukin-6

Open access
Gregersen, Jeppe Skovgaard, Bazancir, Laser Arif, Johansson, Pär Ingemar, Sørensen, Henrik, Achiam, Michael Patrick, Olsen, August Adelsten·2023·Microvascular Research

Abstract

Objective To examine changes in biomarkers of endothelial glycocalyx shedding, endothelial damage, and surgical stress following major open abdominal surgery and the correlation to postoperative morbidity. Introduction Major abdominal surgery is associated with high levels of postoperative morbidity. Two possible reasons are the surgical stress response and the impairment of the glycocalyx and endothelial cells. Further, the degree of these responses may correlate with postoperative morbidity and complications. Methods A secondary data analysis of prospectively collected data from two cohorts of patients undergoing open liver surgery, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, or Whipple procedure (n = 112). Hemodynamics and blood samples were collected at predefined timestamps and analyzed for biomarkers of glycocalyx shedding (Syndecan-1), endothelial activation (sVEGFR1), endothelial damage (sThrombomodulin (sTM)), and surgical stress (IL6). Results Major abdominal surgery led to increased levels of IL6 (0 to 85 pg/mL), Syndecan-1 (17.2 to 46.4 ng/mL), and sVEGFR1 (382.8 to 526.5 pg/mL), peaking at the end of the surgery. In contrast, sTM, did not increase during surgery, but increased significantly following surgery (5.9 to 6.9 ng/mL), peaking at 18 h following the end of surgery. Patients characterized with high postoperative morbidity had higher levels of IL6 (132 vs. 78 pg/mL, p = 0.007) and sVEGFR1 (563.1 vs. 509.4 pg/mL, p = 0.045) at the end of the surgery, and of sTM (8.2 vs. 6.4…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mvr.2023.104543

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gregersen, J. S., Bazancir, L. A., Johansson, P. I., Sørensen, H., Achiam, M. P., & Olsen, A. A.
Affiliations
Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Gregersen, Jeppe Skovgaard
Venue
Microvascular Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
148
Pages
104543
ISSN
0026-2862 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4372340948
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microvascular Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Keywords
endothelial injury, endothelial glycocalyx shedding, interleukin-6, surgical stress response, syndecan-1, soluble VEGFR1, soluble thrombomodulin, postoperative morbidity, liver surgery, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, biomarkers
MeSH terms
Endothelium, Humans, Biomarkers, Interleukin-6, Glycocalyx, Endothelial Cells, Syndecan-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review