Cited by 71Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Anthracnose disease of switchgrass caused by the novel fungal species Colletotrichum navitas

Crouch, Jo Anne, Beirn, Lisa A., Cortese, Laura M., Bonos, Stacy A., Clarke, Bruce B.·2009·Mycological Research

Abstract

In recent years perennial grasses such as the native tallgrass prairie plant Panicum virgatum (switchgrass) have taken on a new role in the North American landscape as a plant-based source of renewable energy. Because switchgrass is a native plant, it has been suggested that disease problems will be minimal, but little research in this area has been conducted. Recently, outbreaks of switchgrass anthracnose disease have been reported from the northeastern United States. Incidences of switchgrass anthracnose are known in North America since 1886 through herbarium specimens and disease reports, but the causal agent of this disease has never been experimentally determined or taxonomically evaluated. In the present work, we evaluate the causal agent of switchgrass anthracnose, a new species we describe as Colletotrichum navitas (navitas=Latin for energy). Multilocus molecular phylogenetics and morphological characters show C. navitas is a novel species in the falcate-spored graminicolous group of the genus Colletotrichum; it is most closely related to the corn anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum graminicola. We present a formal description and illustrations for C. navitas and provide experimental confirmation that this organism is responsible for switchgrass anthracnose disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.09.010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Species of the caudatum and graminicola complexes appear to be restricted to single host species or genera in Poaceae.

    “Species of the caudatum and graminicola complexes appear to be restricted to single host species or genera in Poaceae (Crouch et al. 2009, Crouch 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crouch, J. A., Beirn, L. A., Cortese, L. M., Bonos, S. A., & Clarke, B. B.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Crouch, Jo Anne
Venue
Mycological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
113
Issue
12
Pages
1411-1421
ISSN
0953-7562 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079657006
Cited by
71
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mycological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
switchgrass, new fungal species, Colletotrichum, Colletotrichum graminicola, fungal taxonomy, plant pathogenic fungi, energy crops, etiology
MeSH terms
DNA, Fungal, Environment, Geography, Panicum, New England, North America, Phylogeny, Plant Diseases, Species Specificity, Spores, Fungal, Genetic Variation, Mycological Typing Techniques, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Ecosystem, Evolution, Molecular, Colletotrichum, DNA, Ribosomal Spacer, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review