Challenges of clinical translation in nanomedicine: A qualitative study
Open accessAbstract
Clinical translation of breakthroughs in nanotechnology and nanomedicine is expected to significantly improve diagnostic tools and therapeutic modalities for various diseases. This will not only improve human health and well-being, but is also likely to reduce health care costs in the long run. However, clinical translation is a long, arduous, resource intensive process that requires priority setting, resource mobilization, successful national and international collaboration, and effective coordination between key stakeholders. The aim of this paper is to describe various challenges faced by the stakeholders involved in translational nanomedicine while planning and conducting first in human clinical trials. We draw on insights obtained from 46 in-depth qualitative interviews with key stakeholders from Europe and North America.From the clinical editor Translational research is a crucial step in bringing basic research into clinical reality. This is particularly important in a new field like nanomedicine. Clinical translation is a long and resource intensive process with difficulties along the way. In this article, the authors looked at the challenges faced by various parties in order to help identify ways to overcome these challenges.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regional and national differences within and between regulatory authorities will be a challenge during the clinical trial stage, especially for multi-centric international trials.
“Third, regional and national differences within and between regulatory authorities, especially when running multi-centric international trials, will be a challenge during the clinical trial stage 144 .”
From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [144]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Satalkar, P., Elger, B. S., Hunziker, P., & Shaw, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- University Hospital of Basel (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Satalkar, Priya
- Venue
- Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 893-900
- ISSN
- 1549-9634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2226503580
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Swiss National Science Foundation (PDFMP3_137194/1)
- Universität Basel Forschungsfonds
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Keywords
- clinical translation, translational nanomedicine, stakeholder challenges, nanomedicine, resource mobilization, international cooperation, priority setting, health care costs
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Nanotechnology, Nanomedicine, Translational Research, Biomedical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review