Cited by 124Nanotechnology research and applicationsHealth and Medical Research ImpactsBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

Challenges of clinical translation in nanomedicine: A qualitative study

Open access
Satalkar, Priya, Elger, Bernice Simon, Hunziker, Patrick, Shaw, David·2016·Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Clinical translation of breakthroughs in nanotechnology and nanomedicine is expected to significantly improve diagnostic tools and therapeutic modalities for various diseases. This will not only improve human health and well-being, but is also likely to reduce health care costs in the long run. However, clinical translation is a long, arduous, resource intensive process that requires priority setting, resource mobilization, successful national and international collaboration, and effective coordination between key stakeholders. The aim of this paper is to describe various challenges faced by the stakeholders involved in translational nanomedicine while planning and conducting first in human clinical trials. We draw on insights obtained from 46 in-depth qualitative interviews with key stakeholders from Europe and North America.From the clinical editor Translational research is a crucial step in bringing basic research into clinical reality. This is particularly important in a new field like nanomedicine. Clinical translation is a long and resource intensive process with difficulties along the way. In this article, the authors looked at the challenges faced by various parties in order to help identify ways to overcome these challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nano.2015.12.376

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regional and national differences within and between regulatory authorities will be a challenge during the clinical trial stage, especially for multi-centric international trials.

    “Third, regional and national differences within and between regulatory authorities, especially when running multi-centric international trials, will be a challenge during the clinical trial stage 144 .”

    From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [144]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 124

Authors
Satalkar, P., Elger, B. S., Hunziker, P., & Shaw, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Satalkar, Priya
Venue
Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
893-900
ISSN
1549-9634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2226503580
Cited by
124
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (PDFMP3_137194/1)
  • Universität Basel Forschungsfonds
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
clinical translation, translational nanomedicine, stakeholder challenges, nanomedicine, resource mobilization, international cooperation, priority setting, health care costs
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Nanotechnology, Nanomedicine, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review