Neutrophil targeted nano-drug delivery system for chronic obstructive lung diseases
Abstract
The success of drug delivery to target airway cell(s) remains a significant challenge due to the limited ability of nanoparticle (NP) systems to circumvent protective airway-defense mechanisms. The size, density, surface and physical-chemical properties of nanoparticles are the key features that determine their ability to navigate across the airway-barrier. We evaluated here the efficacy of a PEGylated immuno-conjugated PLGA-nanoparticle (PINP) to overcome this challenge and selectively deliver drug to specific inflammatory cells (neutrophils). We first characterized the size, shape, surface-properties and neutrophil targeting using dynamic laser scattering, transmission electron microscopy and flow cytometry. Next, we assessed the efficacy of neutrophil-targeted PINPs in transporting through the airway followed by specific binding and release of drug to neutrophils. Finally, our results demonstrate the efficacy of PINP mediated non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-(ibuprofen) delivery to neutrophils in murine models of obstructive lung diseases, based on its ability to control neutrophilic-inflammation and resulting lung disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PEGylated immunoconjugated PLGA-nanoparticles demonstrated targeted delivery of ibuprofen to neutrophils, inhibiting neutrophilic inflammation in LPS-induced murine model of obstructive lung disease.
“A formulation of PEGylated immunoconjugated PLGA-nanoparticles demonstrated the targeted delivery of ibuprofen (an anti-inflammatory drug) to neutrophils, which inhibited neutrophilic inflammation in a lipopolysaccharide-induced murine model of obstructive lung disease.190”
From Targeted therapy in chronic diseases using nanomaterial-based drug delivery vehicles (2019) · cites this paper as [190]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Vij, N., Min, T., Bodas, M., Gorde, A., & Roy, I.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vij, Neeraj
- Venue
- Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2415-2427
- ISSN
- 1549-9634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2471708297
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Keywords
- nano-drug delivery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neutrophilic inflammation, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, nanoparticle surface properties
- MeSH terms
- Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer, Animals, Humans, Inflammation, Neutrophils, Polyglycolic Acid, Drug Delivery Systems, Lactic Acid, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Mice, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review