Cited by 83Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

How theory and simulation can drive fuel cell electrocatalysis

Open access
Eslamibidgoli, Mohammad J., Huang, Jun, Kadyk, Thomas, Malek, Ali, Eikerling, Michael·2016·Nano Energy

Abstract

Over the last decade, theory and modeling have become essential tools to navigate the parameter space that governs activity and stability of electrocatalyst systems for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. This perspective covers essential phenomena from atomic scale to nanoscale and discusses the impact of the key parameters at play. It is centered around the development of first-principles electrochemical methods as a foremost goal in the field. The general modeling framework entails at its core a self-consistency problem that must be solved to relate the metal phase potential to descriptors of catalyst activity and stability. Density functional theory has captured a central role in this rapidly evolving field. The article puts more than usual emphasis on aspects of the multifaceted challenges in fuel cell electrocatalysis that at present lie beyond the capabilities of density functional theory; they include metal charging and solvent effects. Following the general discussion of the theoretical-computational framework, an approach for “deciphering” the oxygen reduction reaction is demonstrated; it reconciles reaction pathways and free energy profiles obtained from density functional theory simulations with kinetic modeling of surface reactions and effective kinetic parameters. Another section dwells on the importance of metal charging phenomena that are especially important for the catalytic function of nanoporous media. The penultimate section exposes the ambivalent role of Pt oxide formation in modulating catalytic properties for the oxygen reduction reaction as well as for catalyst corrosion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.004

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eslamibidgoli, M. J., Huang, J., Kadyk, T., Malek, A., & Eikerling, M.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Eikerling, Michael
Venue
Nano Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
29
Pages
334-361
ISSN
2211-2855 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2415625190
Cited by
83
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Nano Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Automotive Partnership Canada (APCPJ417858)
  • NSERC Collaborative Research and Development (354711)
  • Nissan Motor Corp.
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, electrocatalysis, oxygen reduction reaction, density functional theory, solvent effects, nanoporous materials, platinum oxide formation, catalyst corrosion, kinetic modeling, free energy profiles, catalyst stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review