Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

17.46% efficient and highly stable carbon-based planar perovskite solar cells employing Ni-doped rutile TiO2 as electron transport layer

Liu, Xingyue, Liu, Zhiyong, Sun, Bo, Tan, Xianhua, Ye, Haibo, Tu, Yuxue, Shi, Tielin, Tang, Zirong, Liao, Guanglan·2018·Nano Energy

Abstract

Abstract Organometal trihalide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with carbon counter electrode (CE) have attracted tremendous interest due to their remarkable properties such as low cost and high stability. However, carbon-based PSCs always suffer from much lower power conversion efficiency (PCE) than the counterparts with noble metal cathode. Herein, we demonstrate a carbon-based planar heterojunction PSC using high-crystallinity Ni-doped rutile TiO2 as electron transport layer (ETL) for the first time, while copper phthalocyanine (CuPc) is introduced as hole transport layer (HTL). It is found that Ni doping can shift the Fermi level of the ETL upward and increase the charge mobility of the TiO2 film, thus enhancing the charge transport and extraction. An optimized PCE of 17.46% was obtained after 0.01 M Ni doping, comparable to or even better than devices with state-of-the-art doped Spiro-OMeTAD as HTL and Au as CE. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest efficiency that has been reported for carbon-based PSCs. By contrast, the pristine TiO2-based device only displayed a PCE of 15.82%. Detailed superior capability of Ni-doped TiO2 in facilitating charge transfer and suppressing carrier recombination are revealed by Hall effect and photoluminescence (PL) as well as electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements. Furthermore, the use of highly stable CuPc and commercial carbon makes as-prepared PSCs exhibit excellent stability with no obvious decline in PCE after being stored in ambient air for 1200 h. This work presents an important step forwards to the commercialization of carbon-based PSCs with high efficiency and long-term stability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.031

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Liu, Z., Sun, B., Tan, X., Ye, H., Tu, Y., Shi, T., Tang, Z., & Liao, G.
Venue
Nano Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
50
Pages
201-211
ISSN
2211-2855 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803227240
Cited by
167
References
1
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 17.46% efficient and highly stable carbon-based planar perovskite solar cells employing Ni-doped rutile TiO2 as electron transport layer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.031
The paper
Liu, X., Liu, Z., Sun, B., Tan, X., Ye, H., Tu, Y., Shi, T., Tang, Z., & Liao, G. (2018). 17.46% efficient and highly stable carbon-based planar perovskite solar cells employing Ni-doped rutile TiO2 as electron transport layer. Nano Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.