Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of the electrolyte salt anion on the solid electrolyte interphase formation in sodium ion batteries

Eshetu, Gebrekidan Gebresilassie, Diemant, Thomas, Hekmatfar, Maral, Grugeon, Sylvie, Behm, R. Jürgen, Laruelle, Stephane, Armand, Michel, Passerini, Stefano·2019·Nano Energy

Abstract

Abstract Aiming at a more comprehensive understanding of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) in sodium ion batteries (NIBs), a detailed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) investigation of the few-nanometer thick passivation film formed on hard carbon (HC) in contact with various Na+-ion conducting electrolytes is reported. The electrolytes investigated include 1 M solutions of NaPF6, NaClO4, NaTFSI, NaFSI, and NaFTFSI, all dissolved in a common mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC) and diethylene carbonate (DEC) (EC/DEC = 1/1 wt. ratio). For comparison, the study of analogous Li-based electrolytes containing LiPF6 and LiFSI as representative electrolyte salts is also reported. The anion and cation of the electrolyte salt appear to play a key role in determining the overall SEI layer composition, including its depth evolution and thickness. The SEI building species formed on hard carbon by solvent reduction upon sodiation are found to decrease with the various salts in the order: NaPF6 > NaClO4 ≈ NaTFSI > NaFTFSI > NaFSI. The comparison of lithiated and sodiated HC electrodes shows that the SEI layer is more homogeneous and richer in organic species upon the use of Na-based electrolytes. Surface and depth-profiling XPS analysis on HC electrodes charged in the various electrolyte formulations provides in-depth insights on the differences and similarities of the SEI (composition, thickness, depth evolution, etc.) evolving from the variation in the chemical structure of the cations and anions of the respective salts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.040

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
Eshetu, G. G., Diemant, T., Hekmatfar, M., Grugeon, S., Behm, R. J., Laruelle, S., Armand, M., & Passerini, S.
Venue
Nano Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
55
Pages
327-340
ISSN
2211-2855 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898155559
Cited by
425
References
52
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of the electrolyte salt anion on the solid electrolyte interphase formation in sodium ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.040
The paper
Eshetu, G. G., Diemant, T., Hekmatfar, M., Grugeon, S., Behm, R. J., Laruelle, S., Armand, M., & Passerini, S. (2019). Impact of the electrolyte salt anion on the solid electrolyte interphase formation in sodium ion batteries. Nano Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.040

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.