Cited by 316Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Gender differences in the amount and deposition of amyloidβ in APPswe and PS1 double transgenic mice

Open access
Wang, Jun, Tanila, Heikki, Puoliväli, Jukka, Kadish, Inga, Groen, Thomas van·2003·Neurobiology of Disease

Abstract

Transgenic mice carrying both the human amyloid precursor protein (APP) with the Swedish mutation and the presenilin-1 A246E mutation (APP/PS1 mice) develop Alzheimer's disease-like amyloidbeta protein (Abeta) deposits around 9 months of age. These mice show an age-dependent increase in the level of Abeta40 and Abeta42 and in the number of amyloid plaques in the brain. Abeta40 and Abeta42 levels were measured, and amyloid burden and plaque number were quantified, in the hippocampus at the age of 4, 12, and 17 months in both male and female APP/PS1 mice. In all mice, amyloid burden and plaque number increased markedly with age, with female mice bearing a heavier amyloid burden and higher plaque number compared to male mice of the same age, both at 12 and at 17 months of age. The level of both Abeta40 and Abeta42 significantly increased in female mice with age and was always significantly higher in female than in male mice of the same age. Further, there were significant correlations between amyloid burden and Abeta42 level in female mice and between amyloid burden and plaques in both female and male mice. Together these data show that female APP/PS1 mice accumulate amyloid at an earlier age and that they build up more amyloid deposits in the hippocampus than age-matched male mice. Together, these results provide new insights in the potential mechanisms of the observed gender differences in the pathogenesis of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.08.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 316

Authors
Wang, J., Tanila, H., Puoliväli, J., Kadish, I., & Groen, T. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Groen, Thomas van
Venue
Neurobiology of Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
318-327
ISSN
0969-9961 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004739315
Cited by
316
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2004-06-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, APP/PS1 mice, APP Swedish mutation, sex differences, amyloid plaques, amyloid burden, Aβ40, amyloid-beta 42, hippocampus
MeSH terms
Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Neurons, Peptide Fragments, Sex Factors, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Mice, Presenilin-1, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review