Cited by 89Nerve injury and regenerationGlaucoma and retinal disordersNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Role of mTOR in neuroprotection and axon regeneration after inflammatory stimulation

Open access
Leibinger, Marco, Andreadaki, Anastasia, Fischer, Dietmar·2012·Neurobiology of Disease

Abstract

Mature retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) do not normally regenerate injured axons, but degenerate after axotomy. However, inflammatory stimulation (IS) enables RGCs to survive axotomy and regenerate axons in the injured optic nerve. Similar effects are achieved by the genetic deletion of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and subsequent mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation. Here, we report that IS prevents the axotomy-induced decrease of mTOR activity in RGCs in a CNTF/LIF-dependent manner. Inactivation of mTOR significantly reduced the number of long axons regenerating in the optic nerve, but surprisingly, did not affect the initial switch of RGCs into the regenerative state, or the neuroprotective effects associated with IS. In vitro, inhibition of mTOR activity reduced regeneration on myelin or chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), but not on a growth-permissive substrate. Thus, mTOR activity is not generally required for neuroprotection or switching mature neurons into an active regenerative state, but it is important for the maintenance of the axonal growth state and overcoming of inhibitory effects caused by myelin and CSPGs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.01.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 49 · Cited by 89

Authors
Leibinger, M., Andreadaki, A., & Fischer, D.
Affiliations
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Dietmar
Venue
Neurobiology of Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
314-324
ISSN
0969-9961 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040091964
Cited by
89
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Stiftung Querschnittlähmung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
mTOR, neuroprotection, axon regeneration, retinal ganglion cells, axotomy, optic nerve injury, inflammatory stimulation, PTEN, myelin, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, axon growth inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Cells, Cultured, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Myelin Sheath, Nerve Regeneration, Neural Inhibition, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Mice, Knockout, Neuroprotective Agents, Inflammation Mediators, Optic Nerve Injuries, Mice, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review