Role of mTOR in neuroprotection and axon regeneration after inflammatory stimulation
Open accessAbstract
Mature retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) do not normally regenerate injured axons, but degenerate after axotomy. However, inflammatory stimulation (IS) enables RGCs to survive axotomy and regenerate axons in the injured optic nerve. Similar effects are achieved by the genetic deletion of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and subsequent mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation. Here, we report that IS prevents the axotomy-induced decrease of mTOR activity in RGCs in a CNTF/LIF-dependent manner. Inactivation of mTOR significantly reduced the number of long axons regenerating in the optic nerve, but surprisingly, did not affect the initial switch of RGCs into the regenerative state, or the neuroprotective effects associated with IS. In vitro, inhibition of mTOR activity reduced regeneration on myelin or chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), but not on a growth-permissive substrate. Thus, mTOR activity is not generally required for neuroprotection or switching mature neurons into an active regenerative state, but it is important for the maintenance of the axonal growth state and overcoming of inhibitory effects caused by myelin and CSPGs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SOD1 mutants render vulnerable motor neurons dependent on endogenous neuroprotection signaling involving mTOR.
“SOD1 mutants specifically render vulnerable motor neurons dependent on endogenous neuroprotection signaling involving excitability and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR; Leibinger et al., 2012; Saxena et al., 2013).”
From Downregulation of MicroRNA-193b-3p Promotes Autophagy and Cell Survival by Targeting TSC1/mTOR Signaling in NSC-34 Cells (2017) · cites this paper as Leibinger et al., 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 49 · Cited by 89
- Authors
- Leibinger, M., Andreadaki, A., & Fischer, D.
- Affiliations
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, Dietmar
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Disease
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 314-324
- ISSN
- 0969-9961 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040091964
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doaj.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Deutsche Stiftung Querschnittlähmung
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- mTOR, neuroprotection, axon regeneration, retinal ganglion cells, axotomy, optic nerve injury, inflammatory stimulation, PTEN, myelin, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, axon growth inhibition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Axons, Cells, Cultured, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Myelin Sheath, Nerve Regeneration, Neural Inhibition, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Mice, Knockout, Neuroprotective Agents, Inflammation Mediators, Optic Nerve Injuries, Mice, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review