Cited by 185Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Neural response to reward as a predictor of increases in depressive symptoms in adolescence

Open access
Morgan, Judith K., Olino, Thomas M., McMakin, Dana L., Ryan, Neal D., Forbes, Erika E.·2013·Neurobiology of Disease

Abstract

Adolescence is a developmental period characterized by significant increases in the onset of depression, but also by increases in depressive symptoms, even among psychiatrically healthy youth. Disrupted reward function has been postulated as a critical factor in the development of depression, but it is still unclear which adolescents are particularly at risk for rising depressive symptoms. We provide a conceptual stance on gender, pubertal development, and reward type as potential moderators of the association between neural response to reward and rises in depressive symptoms. In addition, we describe preliminary findings that support claims of this conceptual stance. We propose that (1) status-related rewards may be particularly salient for eliciting neural response relevant to depressive symptoms in boys, whereas social rewards may be more salient for eliciting neural response relevant to depressive symptoms in girls and (2) the pattern of reduced striatal response and enhanced medial prefrontal response to reward may be particularly predictive of depressive symptoms in pubertal adolescents. We found that greater vmPFC activation when winning rewards predicted greater increases in depressive symptoms over 2 years, for boys only, and less striatal activation when anticipating rewards predicted greater increases in depressive symptoms over 2 years, for adolescents in mid to late pubertal stages but not those in pre to early puberty. We also propose directions for future studies, including the investigation of social vs. monetary reward directly and the longitudinal assessment of parallel changes in pubertal development, neural response to reward, and depressive symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.03.039

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a large youth sample, blunted reward-related ventral striatum correlated with anhedonia (but not low mood) and predicted transition to subthreshold or clinical depression 2 years later among previously healthy youths.

    “In a large youth sample (N = 1576; mean age: ~14 years), blunted reward-related ventral striatum correlated with anhedonia (but not low mood) and predicted transition to subthreshold or clinical depression 2 years later among previously healthy youths ([119]; see also [120]).”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [120]

    The Discussion reports that lower striatal response during reward anticipation was associated with rising depressive symptoms over two years, particularly in adolescents in mid-to-late puberty. But Participants and Procedure describes a final sample of 72 youths aged 11–13, not 1,576 youths with a mean age near 14. The paper reports changes in depressive-symptom scores, not transitions to subthreshold or clinical depression, and does not establish the claimed anhedonia-versus-low-mood distinction. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 185

Authors
Morgan, J. K., Olino, T. M., McMakin, D. L., Ryan, N. D., & Forbes, E. E.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Morgan, Judith K.
Venue
Neurobiology of Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
52
Pages
66-74
ISSN
0969-9961 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075239685
Cited by
185
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH092603, K01MH074769)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA018910)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
depressive symptoms, adolescence, depression onset, reward processing, medial prefrontal cortex, striatum, pubertal development, gender differences, social reward, monetary rewards, risk prediction, longitudinal prediction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Corpus Striatum, Depression, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reward, Sex Factors, Prefrontal Cortex, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review