Neural response to reward as a predictor of increases in depressive symptoms in adolescence
Open accessAbstract
Adolescence is a developmental period characterized by significant increases in the onset of depression, but also by increases in depressive symptoms, even among psychiatrically healthy youth. Disrupted reward function has been postulated as a critical factor in the development of depression, but it is still unclear which adolescents are particularly at risk for rising depressive symptoms. We provide a conceptual stance on gender, pubertal development, and reward type as potential moderators of the association between neural response to reward and rises in depressive symptoms. In addition, we describe preliminary findings that support claims of this conceptual stance. We propose that (1) status-related rewards may be particularly salient for eliciting neural response relevant to depressive symptoms in boys, whereas social rewards may be more salient for eliciting neural response relevant to depressive symptoms in girls and (2) the pattern of reduced striatal response and enhanced medial prefrontal response to reward may be particularly predictive of depressive symptoms in pubertal adolescents. We found that greater vmPFC activation when winning rewards predicted greater increases in depressive symptoms over 2 years, for boys only, and less striatal activation when anticipating rewards predicted greater increases in depressive symptoms over 2 years, for adolescents in mid to late pubertal stages but not those in pre to early puberty. We also propose directions for future studies, including the investigation of social vs. monetary reward directly and the longitudinal assessment of parallel changes in pubertal development, neural response to reward, and depressive symptoms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a large youth sample, blunted reward-related ventral striatum correlated with anhedonia (but not low mood) and predicted transition to subthreshold or clinical depression 2 years later among previously healthy youths.
“In a large youth sample (N = 1576; mean age: ~14 years), blunted reward-related ventral striatum correlated with anhedonia (but not low mood) and predicted transition to subthreshold or clinical depression 2 years later among previously healthy youths ([119]; see also [120]).”
From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [120]
The Discussion reports that lower striatal response during reward anticipation was associated with rising depressive symptoms over two years, particularly in adolescents in mid-to-late puberty. But Participants and Procedure describes a final sample of 72 youths aged 11–13, not 1,576 youths with a mean age near 14. The paper reports changes in depressive-symptom scores, not transitions to subthreshold or clinical depression, and does not establish the claimed anhedonia-versus-low-mood distinction. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 185
- Authors
- Morgan, J. K., Olino, T. M., McMakin, D. L., Ryan, N. D., & Forbes, E. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Morgan, Judith K.
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Disease
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 66-74
- ISSN
- 0969-9961 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3430834
- OpenAlex
- W2075239685
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH092603, K01MH074769)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA018910)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- depressive symptoms, adolescence, depression onset, reward processing, medial prefrontal cortex, striatum, pubertal development, gender differences, social reward, monetary rewards, risk prediction, longitudinal prediction
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Corpus Striatum, Depression, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reward, Sex Factors, Prefrontal Cortex, Functional Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review