Cited by 27Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Most dystrophic neurites in the common 5xFAD Alzheimer mouse model originate from axon terminals

Open access
Mabrouk, R., Miettinen, P.O., Tanila, H.·2023·Neurobiology of Disease

Abstract

How dystrophic neurites form around amyloid plaques is a key aspect of understanding the early pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease. At present, three hypotheses prevail: (1) dystrophies result from extracellular amyloid-beta (Aβ) toxicity; (2) dystrophies results from accumulation of Aβ into distal neurites; and (3) dystrophies represent blebbing of the somatic membrane of a neuron with high Aβ load. We utilized a unique feature of the common 5xFAD AD mouse model to test these hypotheses. Cortical layer 5 pyramidal neurons show intracellular APP and Aβ accumulation before amyloid plaque formation while dentate granule cells in these mice show no APP accumulation at any age. However, the dentate gyrus shows amyloid plaques by 3 months of age. By a careful confocal microscopic analysis we found no evidence of severe degeneration in amyloid laden layer 5 pyramidal neurons in contrast to hypothesis 3. Using injecting red fluorescent marker into lateral entorhinal projection neurons in 5xFAD mice with endogenous green fluorescent protein (GFP) in dentate granule cells we could demonstrate that all dystrophies is outer molecular layer originate from the axon terminal of entorhinal projection neurons. Immunostaining with vesicular glutamate transporter supported the axonal nature of the dystrophies in the acellular dentate molecular layer. We observed few small dystrophies in the GFP labeled granule cell dendrites. In general GFP labeled dendrites appear normal around the amyloid…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106150

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 27

Authors
Mabrouk, R., Miettinen, P. O., & Tanila, H.
Affiliations
University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Tanila, H.
Venue
Neurobiology of Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
182
Pages
106150
ISSN
0969-9961 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376643367
Cited by
27
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
dystrophic neurites, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, amyloid-beta toxicity, 5xFAD mice, axon terminals, dentate gyrus, pyramidal neurons, vesicular glutamate transporter, dendrites, axonal degeneration
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Transgenic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurites, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Presynaptic Terminals, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review