Cited by 43Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural Innovations and PracticesLatin American rural development

Experience from use of GMOs in Argentinian agriculture, economy and environment

Burachik, Moisés·2010·New Biotechnology

Abstract

Argentina is the second largest grower of genetically modified (GM) crops. This high level of adoption of this new agricultural technology is the result of a complex combination of circumstances. We can identify four main causes that led to this: political support (from agriculture officials), ability to solve prevalent farmers' needs, economic and environmental factors and an early implementation of effective regulations. The political willingness to study this new technology and crops as well as the recruitment of sound professionals and scientists to perform the task was crucial. These professionals, with very diverse backgrounds, created the necessary regulatory framework to work with these new crops. Farmers played a decisive role, as adopting this new technology solved some of their agronomic problems, helped them perform more sustainable agronomic practices and provided economic benefits. Nonetheless, all these advancements had not been possible without a rational, science-based and flexible regulatory framework that would make sure that the GM crops were safe for food, feed and processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 43

Authors
Burachik, M.
Corresponding author
Burachik, Moisés
Venue
New Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
588-592
ISSN
1871-6784 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001793303
Cited by
43
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Latin American rural development
Keywords
genetically modified crops, GM crop adoption, agricultural biotechnology policy, biosafety regulation, agricultural technology adoption, farmer adoption, sustainable agriculture, Argentina
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Argentina, Consumer Product Safety, Environment, Food, Humans, Crops, Agricultural, Risk Assessment, Plants, Genetically Modified, Food, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review