Service user and carer involvement in learning and teaching: A faculty of health staff perspective
Abstract
As part of a larger evaluation study, 20 members of staff in a Faculty of Health were interviewed about the impact of service user and carer involvement on learning and teaching. A qualitative approach was adopted and semi-structured interviews were used to explore current levels of involvement, barriers and solutions. The data generated was analysed using the principles of grounded theory. Findings suggest respondents recognised the requirement to involve service users and carers in their learning activities. Most wanted to develop this aspect of their educational provision but a number of barriers were described. Strategic and operational solutions were proposed to overcome these and respondents were positive about achieving meaningful involvement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some staff feared that cash patients needed to spend on refreshments or public transport would be a barrier for their participation.
“Some staff feared that cash patients needed to spend on refreshments or public transport would be a barrier for their participation.73”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [73]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Gutteridge, R., & Dobbins, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Wolverhampton (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gutteridge, Robin
- Venue
- Nurse Education Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 509-514
- ISSN
- 0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078557202
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Birmingham City University
- University of Birmingham
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- service user involvement, caregiver involvement, health education, staff perspectives, barriers to participation, educational services, health professions education
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Cooperative Behavior, Curriculum, Faculty, Forecasting, United Kingdom, Health Occupations, Humans, Leadership, Patient Participation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Teaching, Nursing Methodology Research, Program Development, Systems Integration, Benchmarking, Needs Assessment, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
