Cited by 77

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Academic cheating among nursing students

Park, Eun-Jun, Park, Seungmi, Jang, In-Sun·2013·Nurse Education Today

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.12.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Anderson, 1994, Cheating by students: Findings, reflections, and remedies, Academic Medicine, 69, 323, 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00002 · DOI
  2. Andrews, 2007, Faculty and student perceptions of academic integrity at U.S. and Canadian dental schools, Journal of Dental Education, 71, 1027, 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2007.71.8.tb04369.x · DOI
  3. Daniel, 1994, Academic misconduct among nursing students: a multivariate investigation, Journal of Professional Nursing, 10, 278, 10.1016/8755-7223(94)90053-1 · DOI
  4. Diekhoff, 1996, College cheating: ten years later, Research in Higher Education, 37, 487, 10.1007/BF01730111 · DOI
  5. Drinan, 1999, Loyalty, learning, & academic integrity, Liberal Education, 85, 28
  6. Faucher, 2009, Academic dishonesty: innovative cheating techniques and the detection and prevention of them, Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 4, 37, 10.1016/j.teln.2008.09.003 · DOI
  7. Gaberson, 1997, Academic dishonesty among nursing students, Nursing Forum, 32, 14, 10.1111/j.1744-6198.1997.tb00205.x · DOI
  8. Ha, 2009, Wissenschaft der Forschung und Kommunikation und die Ausbildung der Studiumsethik, Ratio et Oratio, 2, 7
  9. Haines, 1986, College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude, Research in Higher Education, 25, 342, 10.1007/BF00992130 · DOI
  10. Harding, 2004, Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study, Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 311, 10.1007/s11948-004-0027-3 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Harper, 2006, High tech cheating, Nurse Education in Practice, 6, 364, 10.1016/j.nepr.2006.07.008 · DOI
  12. Hilbert, 1987, Academic fraud: prevalence, practices, and reasons, Journal of Professional Nursing, 3, 39, 10.1016/S8755-7223(87)80026-1 · DOI
  13. Hilbert, 1988, Moral development and unethical behavior among nursing students, Journal of Professional Nursing, 4, 163, 10.1016/S8755-7223(88)80133-9 · DOI
  14. Jackson, J.A., 2006. Community college and university students: Who's cheating and why?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
  15. Kirkland, K.D., 2009. Academic honesty: Is what students believe different from what they do?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, USA.
  16. Ko, 2009, The improvement of regulation and education related with the academic integrity in university, The Journal of Law of Education, 21, 1, 10.17317/tjle.21.2.200912.1 · DOI
  17. McCabe, 2001, Cheating in academic institutions: a decade of research, Ethics & Behavior, 11, 219, 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2 · DOI · Paper page
  18. McCabe, 2009, Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: an empirical investigation, Journal of Nursing Education, 48, 614, 10.3928/01484834-20090716-07 · DOI
  19. McCabe, 1997, Individual and contextual influences on dishonesty: a multicampus investigation, Research in Higher Education, 38, 379, 10.1023/A:1024954224675 · DOI · Paper page
  20. McCrink, 2010, Academic misconduct in nursing students: behaviors, attitudes, rationalizations, and cultural identity, Journal of Nursing Education, 49, 653, 10.3928/01484834-20100831-03 · DOI
  21. Oh, 1999, A study of academic cheating in Korean colleges, The Korean Journal of the Human Development, 6, 64
  22. Pavela, 1978, Judicial review of academic decision-making after Horowitz, School Law Journal, 55, 55
  23. Piascik, 2010, Promoting a culture of academic integrity, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74, 1, 10.5688/aj7406113 · DOI
  24. Rabi, 2006, Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70, 1, 10.5688/aj700473 · DOI
  25. Rennie, 2003, Differences in medical students' attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behavior across the years: a questionnaire study, Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 97, 10.1136/jme.29.2.97 · DOI
  26. Taradi, 2010, Students come to medical schools prepared to cheat: a multi-campus investigation, Journal of Medical Ethics, 36, 666, 10.1136/jme.2010.035410 · DOI
  27. Tippit, 2009, Cheating environments that foster academic integrity, Nursing Education Perspectives, 30, 239
  28. Walker, J.P., 2008. Perceptions and attitudes of high school students toward academic dishonesty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University, Prescott Valley, USA.
  29. Wideman, M.A., 2009. Caring, sharing, coping and control: Academic dishonesty and the nursing student. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Park, E.-J., Park, S., & Jang, I.-S.
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
346-352
ISSN
0260-6917
Cited by
77
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review