Cited by 119Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Health anxiety and cyberchondria among Ege University health science students

Bati, Ayse Hilal, Mandiracioglu, Aliye, Govsa, Figen, Çam, Olcay·2018·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

It is common among health science students to incorrectly believe that they have contracted certain diseases they have recently studied. This can also be seen in the form of health anxiety and investigating health-related information via the internet. Health anxiety, cyberchondria and affecting factors are determined among health science students. The study was conducted at the faculties of Medicine, Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing in 2016-2017 with the participation of 874 students. The data were gathered using a questionnaire as well as health anxiety and cyberchondria severity scales. In the presence of a health problem, 14.2% of students seek health information via the internet. 83.7% use mobile phone to access the internet, ¼ of students conduct health scanning once a week or more. To 65.4%, internet information is correct at medium and above level. No statistically significant difference was found with respect to students' gender, high school, places they lived before, parents' education and scales' scores. The cyberchondria scores of students with health problems are higher in the whole scale and in "distress and mistrust of medical professional" subscales. As the frequency of scanning on the internet increases, the scores of cyberchondria also increase significantly. Medical students had significantly higher scores in "distress, excessiveness and reassurance" subscales. Male students' "mistrust of medical professional and compulsion" subscales scores were also higher.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same authors found a positive correlation between cyberchondria and beliefs about rituals and stop signals.

    “The same authors found a positive correlation between CYB and beliefs about rituals (i.e., the importance of controlling thoughts and emotional states) and stop signals (i.e., internal signals that indicate when to cease coping efforts) [49]”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 119

Authors
Bati, A. H., Mandiracioglu, A., Govsa, F., & Çam, O.
Affiliations
Ege University (TR)
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
71
Pages
169-173
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893234291
Cited by
119
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ege University (2017-TIP-008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
health anxiety, cyberchondria, health sciences students, medical students, online health information seeking, somatoform disorders, gender differences
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Education, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Universities, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review