Cited by 74Ethics in medical practiceEthics in Business and EducationEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Nursing students' ethical dilemmas regarding patient care: An integrative review

Albert, Jacoline Sommer, Younas, Ahtisham, Sana, Sedira·2020·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

BACKGROUND The ethical and moral complexities are inherent to nursing practice. Ethical dilemmas of professional nurses and nursing students' ethical concerns with their preceptors are well-documented. No reviews have synthesized students' ethical dilemmas regarding patient care. OBJECTIVES This review aimed to develop a comprehensive understanding of nursing students' ethical dilemmas regarding patient care in clinical settings. DESIGN An integrative review based on Whittemore and Knafl's methodology. DATA SOURCES Literature was searched within PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Science Direct databases and 13 articles including eight qualitative, three quantitative, one mixed methods and one secondary data analysis were reviewed. The articles were published from January 2000-March 2019. REVIEW METHODS The Mixed Methods Critical Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment. Two reviewers independently reviewed the articles and the third reviewer validated the extracted and synthesized findings. Literature summary tables were developed for data extraction and thematic synthesis techniques and narratives were used for data synthesis. For synthesis, findings from strongly and moderately rated studies were given more weight and those from the low-quality studies were used to support the synthesized themes. RESULTS Three themes emerged: a) applying learned ethical values vs. accepting unethical practices, b) desiring to provide ethical care but lacking autonomous decision making, and c) Silence vs. whistleblowing patient care neglects. CONCLUSIONS Nursing students feel torn between the conflicts of whether to provide ethical care or accept unethical practices, stay silent about patient care neglect or confront and report it, provide ethical and quality care or adapt to the culture due to lack of autonomous decision making. Such conflicts can be detrimental to students' professional learning and mental health. Therefore, educators and nursing institutions should develop programs to support students and help them develop ethical competence and courage to confront such dilemmas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104389

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albert, J. S., Younas, A., & Sana, S.
Affiliations
  • Holy Family Hospital (PK)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Corresponding author
Younas, Ahtisham
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
88
Pages
104389
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010596203
Cited by
74
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
nursing students, ethical dilemmas, patient care, clinical ethics, ethical competence, whistleblowing, professional autonomy, ethical decision-making, organizational culture, nursing education
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Ethics, Nursing, Humans, Students, Nursing, Negotiating, Professional Autonomy, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review