Cited by 26Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesInnovations in Medical Education

Changes in nursing students' self-reported professional competence in simulation-based education and clinical placement: a longitudinal study

Høegh-Larsen, Anne Mette, Gonzalez, Marianne Thorsen, Reierson, Inger Åse, Husebø, Sissel Iren Eikeland, Ravik, Monika·2022·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

Background A primary learning outcome for nursing students is to achieve the professional competence necessary to provide safe and high-quality care in complex and specialized health services. Simulation-based education (SBE) and clinical placement are two educational settings in which nursing students' professional competence can be facilitated as a learning outcome. Objectives The study objectives were to investigate changes in nursing students' self-reported professional competence in SBE and clinical placement and the transfer of this competence from SBE to clinical placement. We also aimed to investigate which competence areas were highest and lowest rated. Design A quantitative longitudinal survey design was applied. Settings The study took place from May 2019 to January 2020 in a simulation center at a Norwegian university and clinical placement in hospital units. Participants Bachelor nursing students (N = 38) in their second and third year of a four-year part-time Norwegian nursing bachelor's degree program. Methods The Nurse Professional Scale Short Form (NPC Scale-SF) consisting of six competence areas was used to measure nursing students' self-reported professional competence across four time points. Paired sample t-test and descriptive statistics were used to analyse data. Results For changes in the longitudinal perspective, students' self-reported professional competence increased significantly. In the transfer perspective, from SBE to clinical placement, four c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105592

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Høegh-Larsen, A. M., Gonzalez, M. T., Reierson, I. Å., Husebø, S. I. E., & Ravik, M.
Affiliations
University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Høegh-Larsen, Anne Mette
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
119
Pages
105592
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4304689977
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
nursing students, professional competence, simulation-based education, clinical practicum, competence transfer, self-reported competence, nursing leadership, nursing education
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Professional Competence, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Nursing, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review