Changes in nursing students' self-reported professional competence in simulation-based education and clinical placement: a longitudinal study
Abstract
Background A primary learning outcome for nursing students is to achieve the professional competence necessary to provide safe and high-quality care in complex and specialized health services. Simulation-based education (SBE) and clinical placement are two educational settings in which nursing students' professional competence can be facilitated as a learning outcome. Objectives The study objectives were to investigate changes in nursing students' self-reported professional competence in SBE and clinical placement and the transfer of this competence from SBE to clinical placement. We also aimed to investigate which competence areas were highest and lowest rated. Design A quantitative longitudinal survey design was applied. Settings The study took place from May 2019 to January 2020 in a simulation center at a Norwegian university and clinical placement in hospital units. Participants Bachelor nursing students (N = 38) in their second and third year of a four-year part-time Norwegian nursing bachelor's degree program. Methods The Nurse Professional Scale Short Form (NPC Scale-SF) consisting of six competence areas was used to measure nursing students' self-reported professional competence across four time points. Paired sample t-test and descriptive statistics were used to analyse data. Results For changes in the longitudinal perspective, students' self-reported professional competence increased significantly. In the transfer perspective, from SBE to clinical placement, four c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Leadership development remains an area requiring further attention in undergraduate nursing education.
“Leadership development remains an area requiring further attention in undergraduate nursing education”
The transfer of simulation learning to clinical practice is not always automatic.
“the transfer of simulation learning to clinical practice is not always automatic”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Almalki, M. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.117315
“Leadership development remains an area requiring further attention in undergraduate nursing education, and the transfer of simulation learning to clinical practice is not always automatic, supporting the need for more targeted and realistic leadership training [7].”
- Authors
- Høegh-Larsen, A. M., Gonzalez, M. T., Reierson, I. Å., Husebø, S. I. E., & Ravik, M.
- Affiliations
- University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Høegh-Larsen, Anne Mette
- Venue
- Nurse Education Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 119
- Pages
- 105592
- ISSN
- 0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4304689977
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- nursing students, professional competence, simulation-based education, clinical practicum, competence transfer, self-reported competence, nursing leadership, nursing education
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Professional Competence, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Nursing, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review