Exploring the potential use of the metaverse in nurse education through a mock trial
Abstract
Background The metaverse has been attracting attention as a space for the application of education, where integrating the real and virtual worlds offers immersive 3D experiences. Consequently, its potential for higher education, including nursing, is being explored as a dynamic alternative to traditional education. Objectives This study explores the applicability of metaverse in nurse education. It was conducted to implement a mock court on the metaverse platform and explore the learning experiences of nursing students through mock trials. Design Qualitative study. Settings A virtual mock court in VRChat (a virtual reality space). Participants Fourteen participants were divided into three groups. Methods An orientation was conducted to explain the virtual space before the mock trial. On the day of the mock trial, a health survey of study participants was conducted in advance. After the mock trial, questionnaires and reflective diaries were written. Results The experiences of nursing students were organized into eleven sub-themes and three themes: "core features of the metaverse platform," "participation in a mock trial in the VRChat virtual space," and "metaverse-based learning using a mock trial." Conclusions Nursing students participated and immersed themselves in learning while accepting the characteristics of the metaverse platform, which differs from face-to-face classes or existing educational methods. The metaverse enables reflective learning based on experiential lear…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With the emergence of technological advances, mock trial use has even reached the metaverse, which bridges reality and virtual reality.
“With the emergence of technological advances, mock trial use has even reached the metaverse, which bridges reality and virtual reality (Lee et al., 2023).”
From Students’ performance and perceptions of mock trials as a teaching and assessment activity over three years at two institutions (2024) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2023
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523 · Cited by 6,311 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rosenberg, E., Hsu, S.-Y., Truong, H.-A., & Taheri, R. (2024) · Pharmacy Education · doi:10.46542/pe.2024.241.2939
- Authors
- Lee, H., Yi, Y., Moon, W., & Yeo, J.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Hanyang University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Yeo, Ji-Young
- Venue
- Nurse Education Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 131
- Pages
- 105974
- ISSN
- 0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386813705
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Hanyang University
- Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2020R1G1A1102709, 2022R1F1A1074909)
- National Research Foundation of Korea
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Education and Learning Interventions
- Keywords
- metaverse, nursing education, virtual reality, mock trial, VRChat, immersive learning, nursing students, experiential learning, reflective learning, online courts
- MeSH terms
- Education, Nursing, Educational Status, Humans, Learning, Problem-Based Learning, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review