The effect of simulation-based learning on nursing students' clinical decision-making skills: systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background Simulation-based education methods improve nursing students' clinical decision-making skills. It allows students to experience situations they may not encounter in a real clinical environment. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to better understand the effectiveness of simulation-based education on clinical decision-making skills in undergraduate nursing students. Design Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. Data sources The review included fourteen studies obtained by scanning the PubMed, EBSCO (Medline, CINAHL), OVID, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Review methods Three authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Critical Appraisal Checklists for experimental and quasi-experimental studies developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Standardized mean difference with 95 % confidence interval was used to facilitate direct comparisons between studies. All statistical tests were performed with Review Manager 5.4 software. Results In this study, 1614 records were reached as a result of the first screening. After examining the titles and removing duplicate articles and other articles that did not meet the research criteria according to the abstracts, 48 articles were included in the full-text analysis. Three researchers read the studies (n = 48) eligible for evaluation, and 14 (n…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simulation can improve clinical decision-making.
“simulation can improve clinical decision-making”
Leadership-focused simulation can strengthen delegation, communication, teamwork, and problem-solving skills required for safe care delivery.
“leadership-focused simulation can strengthen delegation, communication, teamwork, and problem-solving skills required for safe care delivery [5,6].”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 42 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Görücü, S., Türk, G., & Karaçam, Z.
- Affiliations
- Akdeniz University (TR)
- Adnan Menderes University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Görücü, Selçuk
- Venue
- Nurse Education Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-09
- Volume
- 140
- Pages
- 106270
- ISSN
- 0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399447191
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- simulation-based training, clinical decision-making, nursing students, undergraduate nursing education, nursing education, simulation-based education
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Decision-Making, Simulation Training, Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Students, Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review