Cited by 94Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsInnovations in Medical Education

The effect of simulation-based learning on nursing students' clinical decision-making skills: systematic review and meta-analysis

Görücü, Selçuk, Türk, Gülengün, Karaçam, Zekiye·2024·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

Background Simulation-based education methods improve nursing students' clinical decision-making skills. It allows students to experience situations they may not encounter in a real clinical environment. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to better understand the effectiveness of simulation-based education on clinical decision-making skills in undergraduate nursing students. Design Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. Data sources The review included fourteen studies obtained by scanning the PubMed, EBSCO (Medline, CINAHL), OVID, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Review methods Three authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Critical Appraisal Checklists for experimental and quasi-experimental studies developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Standardized mean difference with 95 % confidence interval was used to facilitate direct comparisons between studies. All statistical tests were performed with Review Manager 5.4 software. Results In this study, 1614 records were reached as a result of the first screening. After examining the titles and removing duplicate articles and other articles that did not meet the research criteria according to the abstracts, 48 articles were included in the full-text analysis. Three researchers read the studies (n = 48) eligible for evaluation, and 14 (n…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106270

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 94

Authors
Görücü, S., Türk, G., & Karaçam, Z.
Affiliations
  • Akdeniz University (TR)
  • Adnan Menderes University (TR)
Corresponding author
Görücü, Selçuk
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
140
Pages
106270
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399447191
Cited by
94
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 3
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
simulation-based training, clinical decision-making, nursing students, undergraduate nursing education, nursing education, simulation-based education
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Simulation Training, Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Students, Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review