Cited by 22Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysCancer-related Molecular Pathways

Inducing Oncoprotein Degradation to Improve Targeted Cancer Therapy

Open access
Ray, Dipankar, Cuneo, Kyle C., Rehemtulla, Alnawaz, Lawrence, Theodore S., Nyati, Mukesh K.·2015·Neoplasia

Abstract

Over the past decade, inhibition of the kinase activities of oncogenic proteins using small molecules and antibodies has been a mainstay of our anticancer drug development effort, resulting in several Food and Drug Administration-approved cancer therapies. The clinical effectiveness of kinase-targeted agents has been inconsistent, mostly because of the development of resistance. The expression and function of oncoproteins and tumor suppressors are regulated by numerous posttranslational protein modifications including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and acetylation; hence, targeting specific posttranslational protein modifications provides for an attractive strategy for anticancer drug development. The present review discusses the hypothesis that targeted degradation of an oncoprotein may overcome many of the shortcomings seen with kinase inhibitors and that the approach would enable targeted inhibition of oncogenic proteins previously thought to be undruggable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neo.2015.08.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 22

Authors
Ray, D., Cuneo, K. C., Rehemtulla, A., Lawrence, T. S., & Nyati, M. K.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Nyati, Mukesh K.
Venue
Neoplasia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
697-703
ISSN
1476-5586 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120572950
Cited by
22
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neoplasia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Alfred Taubman Scholarship
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
oncoprotein degradation, targeted cancer therapy, kinase inhibitors, drug resistance, post-translational modification, ubiquitination, phosphorylation, acetylation, undruggable proteins, protein degradation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Neoplasms, Oncogene Proteins, Drug Delivery Systems, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review