Cited by 50Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsMathematics Education and ProgramsCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Maths anxiety and medication dosage calculation errors: A scoping review

Williams, Brett, Davis, Samantha·2016·Nurse Education in Practice

Abstract

A student's accuracy on drug calculation tests may be influenced by maths anxiety, which can impede one's ability to understand and complete mathematic problems. It is important for healthcare students to overcome this barrier when calculating drug dosages in order to avoid administering the incorrect dose to a patient when in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of maths anxiety on healthcare students' ability to accurately calculate drug dosages by performing a scoping review of the existing literature. This review utilised a six-stage methodology using the following databases; CINAHL, Embase, Medline, Scopus, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Trip database (http://www.tripdatabase.com/) and Grey Literature report (http://www.greylit.org/). After an initial title/abstract review of relevant papers, and then full text review of the remaining papers, six articles were selected for inclusion in this study. Of the six articles included, there were three experimental studies, two quantitative studies and one mixed method study. All studies addressed nursing students and the presence of maths anxiety. No relevant studies from other disciplines were identified in the existing literature. Three studies took place in the U.S, the remainder in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Upon analysis of these studies, four factors including maths anxiety were identified as having an influence on a student's drug dosage calculation abilities. Ultimately, the result…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.08.005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mathematics anxiety can negatively affect learning, confidence, and academic achievement.

    “Mathematics anxiety has been described as feelings of tension, apprehension, or fear that interfere with mathematical performance and can negatively affect learning, confidence, and academic achievement [22,23].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, B., & Davis, S.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Williams, Brett
Venue
Nurse Education in Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
20
Pages
139-146
ISSN
1471-5953 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2509619277
Cited by
50
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education in Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
mathematics anxiety, dose calculation, medication errors, nursing students, health professions students, computational accuracy, patient safety, mathematics education
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Mathematics, Medication Errors, Students, Nursing, Nursing Education Research, Drug Dosage Calculations, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review