The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blended learning via distance in pre-registration nursing education: A scoping review
Open accessAbstract
Prior to the Covid-19 global pandemic, we reviewed literature and identified comprehensive evidence of the efficacy of blended learning for pre-registration nursing students who learn across distances and/or via satellite campuses. Following a methodological framework, a scoping literature review was undertaken. We searched six databases (EBSCOHOST (CINHAL plus; Education research Complete; Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre); Google Scholar; EMBASE (Ovid) [ERIC (Ovid); Medline (Ovid)]; PubMed: ProQuest Education Journals & ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source) for the period 2005-December 2015. Critical appraisal for critiquing qualitative and quantitative studies was undertaken, as was a thematic analysis. Twenty-eight articles were included for review, which reported nursing research (n = 23) and student experiences of blended learning in higher education (n = 5). Four key themes were identified in the literature: active learning, technological barriers, support, and communication. The results suggest that when delivered purposefully, blended learning can positively influence and impact on the achievements of students, especially when utilised to manage and support distance education. Further research is needed about satellite campuses with student nurses, to assist with the development of future educational practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There are many examples where manuscripts are titled ‘a scoping review’ without citing or appearing to follow any particular approach [5–9].”
From Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 · Cited by 36,742
Teaching For Quality Learning At University
BIGGS, J. B., & Tang, C. S. (1999) · Cited by 7,559
Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research
Prince, M. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x · Cited by 7,334 · cited 1×
“Active learning can be defined as “any instructional method that engages students in the learning process” (Prince, 2004, p. 223).”
Teaching for quality learning at university
Boulton‐Lewis, G. M. (2008) · Faculty of Education · Cited by 4,926
Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1989) · Biochemical Education · doi:10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0 · Cited by 4,818
The Theory and Practice of Online Learning
Anderson, T. D., & Elloumi, F. (2008) · Athabasca University Press eBooks · doi:10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.01 · Cited by 1,861
Qualitative Research: The essential guide to theory and practice
Savin‐Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2012) · Cited by 1,642
Classifying K-12 Blended Learning.
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012) · Cited by 804
McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12509 · Cited by 615 · cited 4×
“Barriers, such as inadequate infrastructure to support effective use of computers and tablets, were challenges experienced by users, along with low confidence and satisfaction when learning online when their internet and computer skills were weak (Dacanay et al., 2015; Davies et al., 2015; Hyde and Murray, 2005; Mancu…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBliuc, A., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.001 · Cited by 555
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Davies, 2015, The role of distance learning in BSc. nursing education, W. Afr. J. Nurs., 26, 36
- Dijkers, 2015, What is a scoping review?, KT Update, 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Colquhoun, H., Garritty, C. M., Hempel, S., Horsley, T., Langlois, E. V., Lillie, E., O’Brien, K. K., Tunçalp, Ӧ., et al. (2021) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3 · Cited by 887
Langegård, U., Kiani, K., Nielsen, S. J., & Svensson, P. (2021) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00542-1 · Cited by 201
Ibrahim, N. K., Al-Raddadi, R. M., Aldarmasi, M. A., Ghamdi, A. A. A., Gaddoury, M. A., Albar, H. M. S. A., & Ramadan, I. K. (2020) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.11.007 · Cited by 198
Camilleri, M. (2021) · International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences · doi:10.1108/ijqss-03-2020-0034 · Cited by 150
Nursing student experiences of remote learning during the COVID‐19 pandemic
Wallace, S., Schuler, M., Kaulback, M., Hunt, K., & Baker, M. (2021) · Nursing Forum · doi:10.1111/nuf.12568 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Jowsey, T., Foster, G., Cooper-Ioelu, P., & Jacobs, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Otago Polytechnic (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Jowsey, Tanisha
- Venue
- Nurse Education in Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 44
- Pages
- 102775
- ISSN
- 1471-5953 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7195119
- OpenAlex
- W3014025341
- Semantic Scholar
- d6be93c4ba21a5540d8aa4c605b10d8d1bac2daa
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 33
- FWCI
- 20.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nurse Education in Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Keywords
- blended learning, distance education, pre-registration nursing education, satellite campuses, active learning, technological barriers, student support, communication, student experience, nursing students
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Learning, Pneumonia, Viral, Students, Nursing, Nursing Education Research, Nursing Evaluation Research, Coronavirus Infections, Education, Distance, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
