Cited by 38Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Examining the relationship between nursing students’ readiness, literacy and attitudes toward medical artificial intelligence

Boztepe, Handan, Akdeniz Kudubeş, Aslı, Semerci Şahin, Remziye, Durmuş Sarıkahya, Selma, Çınar Özbay, Sevil·2025·Nurse Education in Practice

Abstract

Aim This study examined the relationships among nursing students' readiness for medical AI, AI literacy and their attitudes toward AI within digitalization in healthcare.Background The rapid integration of AI into healthcare highlights the need to assess future professionals' preparedness. Nursing students' readiness, literacy and attitudes toward medical AI are key to its effective and ethical use.Design This study is a cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational research conducted to assess nursing students' readiness for medical AI, AI literacy and their attitudes toward AI in Türkiye.Methods Using an online survey, this cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational study was conducted with 438 nursing students from various universities in Türkiye. Data were collected using the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale (MAIRS), the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale (AILS) and the General Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS).Results The results revealed that student nurses reported high familiarity with AI (88.6 %). MAIRS was significantly correlated with AILS (r = .50), Positive GAAIS (r = .53) and inversely with Negative GAAIS (r = -.17). AILS subdimensions Awareness, Usage, Evaluation and Ethics significantly predicted MAIRS (R²=.25, p < .001). Furthermore, Usage and Evaluation significantly predicted Positive GAAIS (R²=.24, p < .001), while Usage, Evaluation and Ethics significantly predicted Negative GAAIS (R² =.06, p < .001).Conclusion The findings underscore the importance of enhancing nursing students' AI literacy and ethical competence to foster readiness for medical AI. Education programs should incorporate targeted content to improve students' abilities to evaluate and ethically apply AI in healthcare settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104568

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 38

Authors
Boztepe, H., Akdeniz Kudubeş, A., Semerci Şahin, R., Durmuş Sarıkahya, S., & Çınar Özbay, S.
Affiliations
Ankara Medipol Üniversitesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Boztepe, Handan
Venue
Nurse Education in Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-10
Volume
88
Pages
104568
ISSN
1471-5953 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414590916
Cited by
38
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 1
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education in Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, nursing students, AI literacy, attitudes toward AI, AI ethics, digitalization of healthcare
MeSH terms
Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Nursing, Turkey, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review