Cited by 132Primate Behavior and EcologyStress Responses and CortisolAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Behavioural and physiological aspects of stress and aggression in nonhuman primates

Honess, P.E., Marin, C.M.·2006·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

There is considerable interest in the study of stress and aggression in primates as a model for their interpretation in humans. Despite methodological and interpretational problems associated with behavioural and physiological measurement and definition, a considerable body of literature exists on these phenomena in primates. In the course of reviewing this literature we examine examples of many of the sources of variation in stress and aggression, including species identity, sex, age, breeding and social status, individual temperament, background, learning and resource distribution. This is followed by an examination of the interaction between stress and aggression before reviewing the most important areas in which changes in both stress and aggression are measured. In particular we examine those studies covering social aspects of an animal's life, specifically relating to social isolation, crowding as well as group formation, composition and instability. This review reveals the complex and often contradictory nature of relationships, not just between an animal's physiology and its behaviour, but between its stress status and display or receipt of aggression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aggression can compromise welfare if it results in injury and has also been widely associated with physiological stress.

    “For example, aggression can compromise welfare if it results in injury [50] and has also been widely associated with physiological stress [47,51].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 253 · Cited by 132

Authors
Honess, P. E., & Marin, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Honess, P.E.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
390-412
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168838470
Cited by
132
References
253
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
stress, aggression, non-human primates, social isolation, crowding, group composition, social status, sex differences, resource allocation, physiological stress measurement, primate social behavior
MeSH terms
Aggression, Aging, Animals, Primates, Sex Characteristics, Social Dominance, Stress, Psychological, Testosterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review