Cited by 137Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The behavioral actions of lithium in rodent models: Leads to develop novel therapeutics

Open access
O’Donnell, Kelley C., Gould, Todd D.·2007·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

For nearly as long as lithium has been in clinical use for the treatment of bipolar disorder, depression, and other conditions, investigators have attempted to characterize its effects on behaviors in rodents. Lithium consistently decreases exploratory activity, rearing, aggression, and amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion; and it increases the sensitivity to pilocarpine-induced seizures, decreases immobility time in the forced swim test, and attenuates reserpine-induced hypolocomotion. Lithium also predictably induces conditioned taste aversion and alterations in circadian rhythms. The modulation of stereotypy, sensitization, and reward behavior are less consistent actions of the drug. These behavioral models may be relevant to human symptoms and to clinical endophenotypes. It is likely that the actions of lithium in a subset of these animal models are related to the therapeutic efficacy, as well the side effects, of the drug. We conclude with a brief discussion of various molecular mechanisms by which these lithium-sensitive behaviors may be mediated, and comment on the ways in which rat and mouse models can be used more effectively in the future to address persistent questions about the therapeutically relevant molecular actions of lithium.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 291 · Cited by 137

Authors
O’Donnell, K. C., & Gould, T. D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Gould, Todd D.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
932-962
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095377373
Cited by
137
References
291
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (NIH0010875152)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
lithium, rodent models, bipolar disorder, depression, exploratory activity, aggression, hyperlocomotion, pilocarpine-induced seizures, forced swim test, conditioned taste aversion, circadian rhythm, stereotypy, reward behavior, endophenotypes, adverse drug reactions, therapeutics
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Bipolar Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Mice, Inbred Strains, Rats, Inbred Strains, Species Specificity, Lithium Compounds, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review