Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes
Abstract
As the percentage of individuals over the age of 60 years continues to rise, determining the extent and functional significance of age-related declines in sensorimotor performance is of increasing importance. This review examines the specific contribution of proprioceptive feedback to sensorimotor performance in older adults. First, a global perspective of proprioceptive acuity is provided assimilating information from studies where only one of several aspects of proprioceptive function (e.g. sense of position, motion or dynamic position) was quantified, and/or a single joint or limb segment tested. Second, the consequences of proprioceptive deficits are established with particular emphasis placed on postural control. Lastly, the potential for plastic changes in the aging proprioceptive system is highlighted, including studies which relate physical activity to enhanced proprioceptive abilities in older adults. Overall, this review provides a foundation for future studies regarding the proprioceptive feedback abilities of elderly individuals. Such studies may lead to greater advances in the treatment and prevention of the sensorimotor deficits typically associated with the aging process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Proprioception and interoception both decline with old age.
“Proprioception and interoception both decline with old age.”
From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Goble et al., 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 125 · Cited by 426
- Authors
- Goble, D. J., Coxon, J. P., Wenderoth, N., Van Impe, A., & Swinnen, S. P.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Goble, Daniel J.
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-278
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059809990
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 33.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Vlaamse regering
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- proprioception, aging, older adults, sensorimotor performance, proprioceptive acuity, postural control, physical activity, sensorimotor deficits, proprioceptive feedback
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attention, Cognition, Humans, Middle Aged, Proprioception, Psychomotor Performance, Somatosensory Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review