Brain stimulation in the study and treatment of addiction
Abstract
Addiction is a devastating and chronically relapsing disorder. Repeated drug administration induces neuroadaptations associated with abnormal dopaminergic activity in the mesocorticolimbic circuitry, resulting in altered cortical neurotransmission and excitability. Electrical stimulation of specific brain regions can be used in animal models and humans to induce local activation or disruption of specific circuitries or alter neuronal excitability and cause neuroadaptations. Non-surgical stimulation of specific brain regions in human addicts can be achieved by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS is used for transient stimulation or disruption of neural activity in specific cortical regions, which can be used to assess cortical excitability, and to induce changes in cortical excitability. Moreover, it is suggested that repeated stimulation can cause long-lasting neuroadaptations. Therefore, TMS paradigms were used in some studies to assess the presence of altered cortical excitability associated with chronic drug consumption, while other studies have begun to assess the therapeutic potential of repetitive TMS. Similarly, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used to modulate neuronal resting membrane potential in humans and alter cortical excitability. The current review describes how these brain stimulation techniques have recently been used for the study and treatment of addiction in animal models and humans.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reduced inhibitory control and disinhibition are linked to relapse susceptibility.
“Reduced inhibitory control and disinhibition are also associated with relapse susceptibility [13–17].”
Most rTMS studies to date have used LTP-inducing TMS over the DLPFC to reduce craving.
“Most of the rTMS studies to date have applied an LTP-inducing form of TMS to the DLPFC in an effort to decrease craving [17].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 169 · Cited by 181
- Authors
- Feil, J., & Zangen, A.
- Affiliations
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Zangen, Abraham
- ORCID
- Zangen, Abraham
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 559-574
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010247143
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 169
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- addiction, transcranial magnetic stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, cortical excitability, neural adaptation, dopaminergic activity, mesocorticolimbic circuitry, drug addiction treatment, animal models of addiction
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Substance-Related Disorders, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review