Cited by 181Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Brain stimulation in the study and treatment of addiction

Feil, Jodie, Zangen, Abraham·2010·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Addiction is a devastating and chronically relapsing disorder. Repeated drug administration induces neuroadaptations associated with abnormal dopaminergic activity in the mesocorticolimbic circuitry, resulting in altered cortical neurotransmission and excitability. Electrical stimulation of specific brain regions can be used in animal models and humans to induce local activation or disruption of specific circuitries or alter neuronal excitability and cause neuroadaptations. Non-surgical stimulation of specific brain regions in human addicts can be achieved by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS is used for transient stimulation or disruption of neural activity in specific cortical regions, which can be used to assess cortical excitability, and to induce changes in cortical excitability. Moreover, it is suggested that repeated stimulation can cause long-lasting neuroadaptations. Therefore, TMS paradigms were used in some studies to assess the presence of altered cortical excitability associated with chronic drug consumption, while other studies have begun to assess the therapeutic potential of repetitive TMS. Similarly, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used to modulate neuronal resting membrane potential in humans and alter cortical excitability. The current review describes how these brain stimulation techniques have recently been used for the study and treatment of addiction in animal models and humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 169 · Cited by 181

Authors
Feil, J., & Zangen, A.
Affiliations
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Corresponding author
Zangen, Abraham
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
559-574
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010247143
Cited by
181
References
169
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
addiction, transcranial magnetic stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, cortical excitability, neural adaptation, dopaminergic activity, mesocorticolimbic circuitry, drug addiction treatment, animal models of addiction
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Substance-Related Disorders, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review