Cited by 87Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The contribution of brain sub-cortical loops in the expression and acquisition of action understanding abilities

Open access
Caligiore, Daniele, Pezzulo, Giovanni, Miall, R. Chris, Baldassarre, Gianluca·2013·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Research on action understanding in cognitive neuroscience has led to the identification of a wide "action understanding network" mainly encompassing parietal and premotor cortical areas. Within this cortical network mirror neurons are critically involved implementing a neural mechanism according to which, during action understanding, observed actions are reflected in the motor patterns for the same actions of the observer. We suggest that focusing only on cortical areas and processes could be too restrictive to explain important facets of action understanding regarding, for example, the influence of the observer's motor experience, the multiple levels at which an observed action can be understood, and the acquisition of action understanding ability. In this respect, we propose that aside from the cortical action understanding network, sub-cortical processes pivoting on cerebellar and basal ganglia cortical loops could crucially support both the expression and the acquisition of action understanding abilities. Within the paper we will discuss how this extended view can overcome some limitations of the "pure" cortical perspective, supporting new theoretical predictions on the brain mechanisms underlying action understanding that could be tested by future empirical investigations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.016

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brain loops might extend beyond the striatum and include the cerebellum, which has been assumed to encode a large repertoire of internal models required to predict and control action and its timing.

    “Brain loops might extend beyond the striatum and include, for example, the cerebellum, which – given its remarkably homogenous microarchitecture – has been often assumed to be able to encode a large repertoire of internal (generative) models required to predict and control action and its timing (Caligiore et al., 2013, Imamizu et al., 2003, Miall and Wolpert, 1996, Wolpert et al., 1998).”

    From Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control (2015) · cites this paper as Caligiore et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 170 · Cited by 87

Authors
Caligiore, D., Pezzulo, G., Miall, R. C., & Baldassarre, G.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Institute for Computational Linguistics “A. Zampolli” (IT)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Caligiore, Daniele
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
2504-2515
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106205767
Cited by
87
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • IM-CLeVeR–Intrinsically Motivated Cumulative Learning Versatile Robots” (FP7-IP -231722)
  • Goal-Leaders (FP7-ICT-270108)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
action understanding, mirror neurons, motor experience, parietal cortex, premotor cortex, embodied cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Neural Pathways, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review