Cited by 66Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Early-life risk factors for panic and separation anxiety disorder: Insights and outstanding questions arising from human and animal studies of CO2 sensitivity

Battaglia, Marco, Ogliari, Anna, D’Amato, Francesca, Kinkead, Richard·2014·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Genetically informative studies showed that genetic and environmental risk factors act and interact to influence liability to (a) panic disorder, (b) its childhood precursor separation anxiety disorder, and (c) heightened sensitivity to CO2, an endophenotype common to both disorders. Childhood adversities including parental loss influence both panic disorder and CO2 hypersensitivity. However, childhood parental loss and separation anxiety disorder are weakly correlated in humans, suggesting the presence of alternative pathways of risk. The transferability of tests that assess CO2 sensitivity - an interspecific quantitative trait common to all mammals - to the animal laboratory setting allowed for environmentally controlled studies of early parental separation. Animal findings paralleled those of human studies, in that different forms of early maternal separation in mice and rats evoked heightened CO2 sensitivity; in mice, this could be explained by gene-by-environment interactional mechanisms. While several questions and issues (including obvious divergences between humans and rodents) remain open, parallel investigations by contemporary molecular genetic tools of (1) human longitudinal cohorts and (2) animals in controlled laboratory settings, can help elucidate the mechanisms beyond these phenomena.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.04.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 98 · Cited by 66

Authors
Battaglia, M., Ogliari, A., D’Amato, F., & Kinkead, R.
Affiliations
  • Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec (CA)
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise (CA)
Corresponding author
Battaglia, Marco
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
46
Pages
455-464
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984904967
Cited by
66
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
panic disorder, separation anxiety disorder, CO2 sensitivity, endophenotypes, early life risk factors, childhood adversity, parental loss, gene-environment interaction, rodents, mice, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Separation, Carbon Dioxide, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Panic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review