Early-life risk factors for panic and separation anxiety disorder: Insights and outstanding questions arising from human and animal studies of CO2 sensitivity
Abstract
Genetically informative studies showed that genetic and environmental risk factors act and interact to influence liability to (a) panic disorder, (b) its childhood precursor separation anxiety disorder, and (c) heightened sensitivity to CO2, an endophenotype common to both disorders. Childhood adversities including parental loss influence both panic disorder and CO2 hypersensitivity. However, childhood parental loss and separation anxiety disorder are weakly correlated in humans, suggesting the presence of alternative pathways of risk. The transferability of tests that assess CO2 sensitivity - an interspecific quantitative trait common to all mammals - to the animal laboratory setting allowed for environmentally controlled studies of early parental separation. Animal findings paralleled those of human studies, in that different forms of early maternal separation in mice and rats evoked heightened CO2 sensitivity; in mice, this could be explained by gene-by-environment interactional mechanisms. While several questions and issues (including obvious divergences between humans and rodents) remain open, parallel investigations by contemporary molecular genetic tools of (1) human longitudinal cohorts and (2) animals in controlled laboratory settings, can help elucidate the mechanisms beyond these phenomena.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fast + slow practices may provide benefits by teaching practitioners to slow breathing and self-soothe, or by building CO2 tolerance.
“Such practices may provide benefits by teaching practitioners to slow their breathing patterns and self-soothe during stressful situations; or by building CO2 tolerance, which is inversely related to symptoms of stress and anxiety [110].”
From Breathing Practices for Stress and Anxiety Reduction: Conceptual Framework of Implementation Guidelines Based on a Systematic Review of the Published Literature (2023) · cites this paper as [110]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 98 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Battaglia, M., Ogliari, A., D’Amato, F., & Kinkead, R.
- Affiliations
- Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec (CA)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
- Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Battaglia, Marco
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 46
- Pages
- 455-464
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984904967
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Keywords
- panic disorder, separation anxiety disorder, CO2 sensitivity, endophenotypes, early life risk factors, childhood adversity, parental loss, gene-environment interaction, rodents, mice, rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anxiety, Separation, Carbon Dioxide, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Panic Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review