Neural and behavioral responses to attractiveness in adult and infant faces
Abstract
Facial attractiveness provides a very powerful motivation for sexual and parental behavior. We therefore review the importance of faces to the study of neurobiological control of human reproductive motivations. For heterosexual individuals there is a common brain circuit involving the nucleus accumbens, the medial prefrontal, dorsal anterior cingulate and the orbitofrontal cortices that is activated more by attractive than unattractive faces, particularly for faces of the opposite sex. Behavioral studies indicate parallel effects of attractiveness on incentive salience or willingness to work to see faces. There is some evidence that the reward value of opposite sex attractiveness is more pronounced in men than women, perhaps reflecting the greater importance assigned to physical attractiveness by men when evaluating a potential mate. Sex differences and similarities in response to facial attractiveness are reviewed. Studies comparing heterosexual and homosexual observers indicate the orbitofrontal cortex and mediodorsal thalamus are more activated by faces of the desired sex than faces of the less-preferred sex, independent of observer gender or sexual orientation. Infant faces activate brain regions that partially overlap with those responsive to adult faces. Infant faces provide a powerful stimulus, which also elicits sex differences in behavior and brain responses that appear dependent on sex hormones. There are many facial dimensions affecting perceptions of attractiveness that remain unexplored in neuroimaging, and we conclude by suggesting that future studies combining parametric manipulation of face images, brain imaging, hormone assays and genetic polymorphisms in receptor sensitivity are needed to understand the neural and hormonal mechanisms underlying reproductive drives.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The body odor signaling sexual availability leads to greater responsivity in brain networks linked to the core and extended system involving face processing and the emotion- and reward-related regions responsible for esthetic judgments.
“Thus, the body odor signaling sexual availability was found to lead to greater responsivity in the brain networks linked to the core system and the extended system involving face processing (the fusiform gyrus, the temporal pole, the insula and the amygdala) ( Hahn and Perrett, 2014 ;Haxby et al., 2000 ) and the emotion-and reward-related regions responsible for esthetic judgments (the orbitofront”
From Male brain processing of the body odor of ovulating women compared to that of pregnant women (2021) · cites this paper as Hahn and Perrett, 2014
These regions are involved in face processing and attractiveness rating, which is also related to emotion processing where both regions (anterior insula, ACC) play a central role.
“In addition, these regions are involved in face processing ( Hahn and Perrett, 2014 ) and attractiveness rating, which is also related to emotion processing where both regions (e.g., anterior insula, ACC) play a central role ( Kohn et al., 2014 ).”
From Male brain processing of the body odor of ovulating women compared to that of pregnant women (2021) · cites this paper as Hahn and Perrett, 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 246 · Cited by 167
- Authors
- Hahn, A. C., & Perrett, D. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- University of St Andrews (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hahn, Amanda C.
- Perrett, David I.
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 46
- Pages
- 591-603
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164237513
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 246
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Research Council (282655)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- facial attractiveness, face perception, reproductive motivation, mate choice, nucleus accumbens, orbitofrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, incentive salience, sex differences, sexual orientation, infant faces, sex hormones, reward value
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Face, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Motivation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Sex Characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review