Roots of a social brain: Developmental models of emerging animacy-detection mechanisms
Abstract
Here, we review evidence of unlearned predispositions to orient toward visual and auditory cues associated with the presence of animate creatures. We concentrate on studies on chicks of galliform species, whose behavioural preferences for social partners are analyzed in a comparative perspective with respect to the human developmental literature. The emerging nature of chicks' social predispositions is discussed in relation to the underlying physiological mechanisms and to the role of genetic and environmental factors in their development. In the second part of the review, we summarize evidence on the neural substrate of the animacy detectors, again focusing on our animal model of election, the domestic chick. On the basis of a substantial amount of indirect evidence, subpallial structures, among which the optic tectum (homologous to the mammalian superior colliculus), seem to comprise the most probable candidates. We also discuss some preliminary evidence of different brain activity, measured by IEG expression, in chicks exposed to predisposed or a non-predisposed stimulus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This process is visible in extant animals, whose attention focusing skills may develop partly via social mechanisms and who are hyper-attuned to social cues.
“This process is visible in extant animals, whose attention focusing skills may develop partly via social mechanisms (e.g. in young humans [35]), and who are hyper-attuned to social cues [36–38].”
From The social origins of consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 409 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Rosa Salva, O., Mayer, U., & Vallortigara, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Trento (IT)
- ORCID
- Mayer, U.
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 150-168
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080000943
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 409
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- social brain, innate predispositions, galliform birds, domestic chicks, social orientation, optic tectum, superior colliculus, immediate early gene expression, neural correlates, comparative developmental psychology, genetic and environmental factors
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Brain, Cues, Humans, Instinct, Models, Biological, Motion Perception, Social Perception, Galliformes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review