Cited by 123Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and PerceptionPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Roots of a social brain: Developmental models of emerging animacy-detection mechanisms

Rosa Salva, O., Mayer, U., Vallortigara, G.·2015·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Here, we review evidence of unlearned predispositions to orient toward visual and auditory cues associated with the presence of animate creatures. We concentrate on studies on chicks of galliform species, whose behavioural preferences for social partners are analyzed in a comparative perspective with respect to the human developmental literature. The emerging nature of chicks' social predispositions is discussed in relation to the underlying physiological mechanisms and to the role of genetic and environmental factors in their development. In the second part of the review, we summarize evidence on the neural substrate of the animacy detectors, again focusing on our animal model of election, the domestic chick. On the basis of a substantial amount of indirect evidence, subpallial structures, among which the optic tectum (homologous to the mammalian superior colliculus), seem to comprise the most probable candidates. We also discuss some preliminary evidence of different brain activity, measured by IEG expression, in chicks exposed to predisposed or a non-predisposed stimulus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This process is visible in extant animals, whose attention focusing skills may develop partly via social mechanisms and who are hyper-attuned to social cues.

    “This process is visible in extant animals, whose attention focusing skills may develop partly via social mechanisms (e.g. in young humans [35]), and who are hyper-attuned to social cues [36–38].”

    From The social origins of consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 409 · Cited by 123

Authors
Rosa Salva, O., Mayer, U., & Vallortigara, G.
Affiliations
University of Trento (IT)
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
50
Pages
150-168
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080000943
Cited by
123
References
409
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
social brain, innate predispositions, galliform birds, domestic chicks, social orientation, optic tectum, superior colliculus, immediate early gene expression, neural correlates, comparative developmental psychology, genetic and environmental factors
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Brain, Cues, Humans, Instinct, Models, Biological, Motion Perception, Social Perception, Galliformes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review