Cited by 263Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

An integrative neural model of social perception, action observation, and theory of mind

Open access
Yang, Daniel Y.-J., Rosenblau, Gabriela, Keifer, Cara, Pelphrey, Kevin A.·2015·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

In the field of social neuroscience, major branches of research have been instrumental in describing independent components of typical and aberrant social information processing, but the field as a whole lacks a comprehensive model that integrates different branches. We review existing research related to the neural basis of three key neural systems underlying social information processing: social perception, action observation, and theory of mind. We propose an integrative model that unites these three processes and highlights the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), which plays a central role in all three systems. Furthermore, we integrate these neural systems with the dual system account of implicit and explicit social information processing. Large-scale meta-analyses based on Neurosynth confirmed that the pSTS is at the intersection of the three neural systems. Resting-state functional connectivity analysis with 1000 subjects confirmed that the pSTS is connected to all other regions in these systems. The findings presented in this review are specifically relevant for psychiatric research especially disorders characterized by social deficits such as autism spectrum disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.020

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These brain regions overlap with areas typically considered important in language, social communication, self-referential and social cognition, pain and emotion.

    “These brain regions overlap with areas typically considered important in processes such as language, social communication, self-referential and social cognition, pain and emotion.35, 36, 37, 38, 39”
  • Parents show activation in empathy-based circuitry including anterior insula and anterior cingulate gyrus when responding to infants' cries or pain.

    “Parents also show activation in empathy-based circuitry, including anterior insula and anterior cingulate gyrus, when responding to infants’ cries or pain (Yang et al. 2015).”

    From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as Yang et al. 2015

  • Understanding infants' subtle and nonverbal cues requires activity of a mentalizing network including superior temporal sulcus, posterior cingulate gyrus, temporal parietal junction, and vmPFC.

    “Understanding infants’ subtle and nonverbal cues requires the activity of a mentalizing network, including the superior temporal sulcus, the posterior cingulate gyrus, temporal parietal junction, and vmPFC (Kanat et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2015).”

    From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as Yang et al. 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 189 · Cited by 263

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nichols S Stich SP 2003 Mindreading: An Integrated Account of Pretence, Self-awareness, and Understanding Other Minds OUP Oxford

Authors
Yang, D. Y.-J., Rosenblau, G., Keifer, C., & Pelphrey, K. A.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Yang, Daniel Y.-J.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
51
Pages
263-275
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967357157
Cited by
263
References
189
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 12
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale Child Study Center
  • Autism Speaks Meixner Postdoctoral Fellowship in Translational Research (9284)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
social perception, action observation, theory of mind, posterior superior temporal sulcus, dual-process models, resting-state functional connectivity, autism spectrum disorder, social dysfunction, social information processing
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Models, Neurological, Motion Perception, Social Perception, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review