Cited by 142Urban Green Space and HealthStress Responses and CortisolNoise Effects and Management

Brains in the city: Neurobiological effects of urbanization

Open access
Lambert, Kelly G., Nelson, Randy J., Jovanovic, Tanja, Cerdá, Magdalena·2015·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

With a majority of humans now living in cities, strategic research is necessary to elucidate the impact of this evolutionarily unfamiliar habitat on neural functions and well-being. In this review, both rodent and human models are considered in the evaluation of the changing physical and social landscapes associated with urban dwellings. Animal models assessing increased exposure to artificial physical elements characteristic of urban settings, as well as exposure to unnatural sources of light for extended durations, are reviewed. In both cases, increased biomarkers of mental illnesses such as major depression have been observed. Additionally, applied human research emphasizing the emotional impact of environmental threats associated with urban habitats is considered. Subjects evaluated in an inner-city hospital reveal the impact of combined specific genetic vulnerabilities and heightened stress responses in the expression of posttraumatic stress disorder. Finally, algorithm-based models of cities have been developed utilizing population-level analyses to identify risk factors for psychiatric illness. Although complex, the use of multiple research approaches, as described herein, results in an enhanced understanding of urbanization and its far-reaching effects--confirming the importance of continued research directed toward the identification of putative risk factors associated with psychiatric illness in urban settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.04.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is reasonable to expect that widespread disruption of circadian rhythms would contribute to the prevalence of mood disorders.

    “Thus, it is reasonable to expect that widespread disruption of circadian rhythms would contribute to the prevalence of mood disorders9,32,33.”

    From Circadian rhythm disruption and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 208 · Cited by 142

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Decatur S 2012 When the number 9 bus was like home, and downtown was my playground Piiparinen R Trubek A Rust Belt Chic Cleveland OH Rust Belt Chic Press
  2. Epstein JM Axtell RL 1996 Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up (complex adaptive systems) Boston MIT Press
  3. Hebb DO 1949 The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychology Theory New York John Wiley and Sons
  4. Peen J Schoevers RA Beekman AT Dekker J 2010 The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 121 84 93 19624573
  5. Shafer G 1995 Philosophical foundations for causal networks, Advances in Intelligent Computing—IPMU'94 Springer 1 12
  6. Sheline YI Sanghavi M Mintun MA Gado MH 1999 Depression duration but not age predicts hippocampal volume loss in medically healthy women with recurrent major depression J Neurosci 19 5034 5043 10366636 PMC6782668
  7. Wilson EO 1984 Biophilia Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
  8. Wilson EO 1993 Biophilia and the conservation ethic Kellert SR Wilson EO The Biophilia Hypothesis 31 41 Washington DC Island Press

Authors
Lambert, K. G., Nelson, R. J., Jovanovic, T., & Cerdá, M.
Affiliations
  • Randolph–Macon College (US)
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Lambert, Kelly G.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
58
Pages
107-122
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042008137
Cited by
142
References
208
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF (IOS-11-18792)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH071537, MH096764, MH098212, MH092576, MH100122)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
urbanization, urban environment, neurobiology, major depressive disorder, artificial light exposure, post-traumatic stress disorder, stress response, genetic susceptibility, psychiatric risk factors, rodent models, human well-being
MeSH terms
Animals, Mental Disorders, Brain, Environment, Humans, Neurobiology, Urbanization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review