Perceiving emotional expressions in others: Activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses of explicit evaluation, passive perception and incidental perception of emotions
Open accessAbstract
We conducted a series of activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analyses to determine the commonalities and distinctions between separate levels of emotion perception, namely incidental perception, passive perception, and explicit evaluation of emotional expressions. Pooling together more than 180 neuroimaging experiments using facial, vocal or body expressions, our results are threefold. First, explicitly evaluating the emotions of others recruits brain regions associated with the sensory processing of expressions, such as the inferior occipital gyrus, middle fusiform gyrus and the superior temporal gyrus, and brain regions involved in low-level and high-level mindreading, namely the posterior superior temporal sulcus, the inferior frontal cortex and dorsomedial frontal cortex. Second, we show that only the sensory regions were also consistently active during the passive perception of emotional expressions. Third, we show that the brain regions involved in mindreading were active during the explicit evaluation of both facial and vocal expressions. We discuss these results in light of the existing literature and conclude by proposing a cognitive model for perceiving and evaluating the emotions of others.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effect found in discrimination of both negative and positive states supports evidence of a generalized role of OXT in modulating CeA function in response to socially communicated salient information.
“The effect we found in the discrimination of both negative and positive states, however, supports the evidence of a generalized role of OXT in modulating CeA function in the response to socially communicated salient information, similar to evidence in humans [70,90,92,106,107].”
From Oxytocin Signaling in the Central Amygdala Modulates Emotion Discrimination in Mice (2019) · cites this paper as [90]
Mice can discriminate emotions in others in a way that is distinct from sociability.
“our data provide some indication that, similar to human emotion recognition tasks [70,90,92,121], mice can discriminate emotions in others in a way that is distinct from sociability.”
From Oxytocin Signaling in the Central Amygdala Modulates Emotion Discrimination in Mice (2019) · cites this paper as [90]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 254 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Dricu, M., & Frühholz, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Dricu, Mihai
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 810-828
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2550526227
- Semantic Scholar
- 87717a904e8bb9059808478b473aef4d4df8ae62
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 345 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (105314_146559/1)
- National Center for Theoretical Sciences (51NF40-104897, SNSF PP00P1_157409/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- emotion perception, emotional expression, facial expressions, vocal expression, body expression, theory of mind, passive perception, superior temporal sulcus, fusiform gyrus, inferior frontal cortex, dorsomedial frontal cortex, inferior occipital gyrus
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Likelihood Functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review