Cited by 60Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Motor dysfunction as research domain across bipolar, obsessive-compulsive and neurodevelopmental disorders

Hirjak, Dusan, Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas, Fritze, Stefan, Sambataro, Fabio, Kubera, Katharina M., Wolf, Robert C.·2018·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

&NA; Although genuine motor abnormalities (GMA) are frequently found in schizophrenia, they are also considered as an intrinsic feature of bipolar, obsessive‐compulsive, and neurodevelopmental disorders with early onset such as autism, ADHD, and Tourette syndrome. Such transnosological observations strongly suggest a common neural pathophysiology. This systematic review highlights the evidence on GMA and their neuroanatomical substrates in bipolar, obsessive‐compulsive, and neurodevelopmental disorders. The data lends support for a common pattern contributing to GMA expression in these diseases that seems to be related to cerebello‐thalamo‐cortical, fronto‐parietal, and cortico‐subcortical motor circuit dysfunction. The identified studies provide first evidence for a motor network dysfunction as a correlate of early neurodevelopmental deviance prior to clinical symptom expression. There are also first hints for a developmental risk factor model of these mental disorders. An in‐depth analysis of motor networks and related patho‐(physiological) mechanisms will not only help promoting Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Motor System construct, but also facilitate the development of novel psychopharmacological models, as well as the identification of neurobiologically plausible target sites for non‐invasive brain stimulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 475 · Cited by 60

Authors
Hirjak, D., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Fritze, S., Sambataro, F., Kubera, K. M., & Wolf, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Udine (IT)
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
95
Pages
315-335
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892120013
Cited by
60
References
475
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Research Foundation (DFG) (DFG HI 1928/2-1, WO 1883/6-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, neurodevelopmental disorders, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Tourette syndrome, cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit, developmental risk factors, non-invasive brain stimulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Bipolar Disorder, Humans, Movement Disorders, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review