Anxious brain networks: A coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity studies in anxiety
Open accessAbstract
Anxiety and anxiety disorders are associated with specific alterations to functional brain networks, including intra-networks and inter-networks. Given the heterogeneity within anxiety disorders and inconsistencies in functional network differences across studies, identifying common patterns of altered brain networks in anxiety is imperative. Here, we conducted an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity studies in anxiety and anxiety disorders (including 835 individuals with different levels of anxiety or anxiety disorders and 508 controls). Results show that anxiety can be characterized by hypo-connectivity of the affective network with executive control network (ECN) and default mode network (DMN), as well as decoupling of the ECN with the DMN. The connectivity within the salience network and its connectivity with sensorimotor network are also attenuated. These results reveal consistent dysregulations of affective and cognitive control related networks over networks related to emotion processing in anxiety and anxiety disorders. The current findings provide an empirical foundation for an integrated model of brain network alterations that are common across anxiety and anxiety disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 114 · Cited by 212
- Authors
- Xu, J., Van Dam, N. T., Feng, C., Luo, Y., Ai, H., Gu, R., & Xu, P.
- Affiliations
- Shenzhen University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, Jie
- Ai, Hui
- Gu, Ruolei
- Xu, Pengfei
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 96
- Pages
- 21-30
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900917761
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (2014CB744600, 31671133, 973 Program, 2011CB711000, KQTD2015033016104926, 31871137, 31571124, 31700959, 31500920, 31530031, 81471376)
- Shenzhen University
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2014CB744600, 31671133, 2011CB711000)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- anxiety, anxiety disorders, resting-state functional connectivity, brain networks, affective networks, frontoparietal network, default mode network, salience network, sensorimotor network, network decoupling, emotional processing, cognitive control
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Rest, Likelihood Functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review