Cited by 247Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceNeural dynamics and brain functionFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Neural signs and mechanisms of consciousness: is there a potential convergence of theories of consciousness in sight?

Northoff, Georg, Lamme, Victor·2020·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Various theories for the neural basis of consciousness have been proposed, suggesting a diversity of neural signs and mechanisms. We ask to what extent this diversity is real, or whether many theories share the same basic ideas with a potential for convergence towards a more unified theory of the neural basis of consciousness. For that purpose, we review and compare the various neural signs, measures, and mechanisms proposed in the different theories. We demonstrate that different theories focus on neural signs and measures of distinct aspects of neural activity including stimulus-related, prestimulus, and resting state activity as well as on distinct features of consciousness. Therefore, the various mechanisms proposed in the different theories may, in part, complement each other. Together, we provide insight into the shared basis and convergences (and, in part, discrepancies) of the different theories of consciousness. We conclude that the different theories concern distinct aspects of both neural activity and consciousness which, as we suppose, may be integrated and nested within the brain's overall temporo-spatial dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work has highlighted both the proliferation of theories of consciousness and the remarkable diversity of their conceptual foundations and explanatory targets.

    “Recent work has highlighted both the proliferation of theories of consciousness and the remarkable diversity of their conceptual foundations and explanatory targets (Kuhn, 2024; Mudrik et al., 2025; Northoff & Lamme, 2020; Seth & Bayne, 2022).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 206 · Cited by 247

Authors
Northoff, G., & Lamme, V.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Northoff, Georg
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
118
Pages
568-587
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047646103
Cited by
247
References
206
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
neural basis of consciousness, theory of consciousness, neural mechanisms of consciousness, convergence of theories, pre-stimulus activity, resting-state brain activity, unified theory of consciousness
MeSH terms
Brain, Consciousness, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review