Neural signs and mechanisms of consciousness: is there a potential convergence of theories of consciousness in sight?
Abstract
Various theories for the neural basis of consciousness have been proposed, suggesting a diversity of neural signs and mechanisms. We ask to what extent this diversity is real, or whether many theories share the same basic ideas with a potential for convergence towards a more unified theory of the neural basis of consciousness. For that purpose, we review and compare the various neural signs, measures, and mechanisms proposed in the different theories. We demonstrate that different theories focus on neural signs and measures of distinct aspects of neural activity including stimulus-related, prestimulus, and resting state activity as well as on distinct features of consciousness. Therefore, the various mechanisms proposed in the different theories may, in part, complement each other. Together, we provide insight into the shared basis and convergences (and, in part, discrepancies) of the different theories of consciousness. We conclude that the different theories concern distinct aspects of both neural activity and consciousness which, as we suppose, may be integrated and nested within the brain's overall temporo-spatial dynamics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent work has highlighted both the proliferation of theories of consciousness and the remarkable diversity of their conceptual foundations and explanatory targets.
“Recent work has highlighted both the proliferation of theories of consciousness and the remarkable diversity of their conceptual foundations and explanatory targets (Kuhn, 2024; Mudrik et al., 2025; Northoff & Lamme, 2020; Seth & Bayne, 2022).”
From Integrated information and predictive processing theories of consciousness: An adversarial collaborative review (2026) · cites this paper as Northoff & Lamme, 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 206 · Cited by 247
- Authors
- Northoff, G., & Lamme, V.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Northoff, Georg
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 118
- Pages
- 568-587
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3047646103
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 206
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- neural basis of consciousness, theory of consciousness, neural mechanisms of consciousness, convergence of theories, pre-stimulus activity, resting-state brain activity, unified theory of consciousness
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Consciousness, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review