Cited by 33Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual perception and processing mechanismsHallucinations in medical conditions

Visual mental imagery engages the left fusiform gyrus, but not the early visual cortex: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging evidence

Open access
Spagna, Alfredo, Hajhajate, Dounia, Liu, Jianghao, Bartolomeo, Paolo·2021·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The dominant neural model of visual mental imagery (VMI) stipulates that memories from the medial temporal lobe acquire sensory features in early visual areas. However, neurological patients with damage restricted to the occipital cortex typically show perfectly vivid VMI, while more anterior damages extending into the temporal lobe, especially in the left hemisphere, often cause VMI impairments. Here we present two major results reconciling neuroimaging findings in neurotypical subjects with the performance of brain-damaged patients: (1) A large-scale meta-analysis of 46 fMRI studies, of which 27 investigated specifically visual mental imagery, revealed that VMI engages fronto-parietal networks and a well-delimited region in the left fusiform gyrus. (2) A Bayesian analysis showed no evidence for imagery-related activity in early visual cortices. We propose a revised neural model of VMI that draws inspiration from recent cytoarchitectonic and lesion studies, whereby fronto-parietal networks initiate, modulate, and maintain activity in a core temporal network centered on the fusiform imagery node, a high-level visual region in the left fusiform gyrus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.029

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The top-down component of voluntary imagery is reflected in the involvement of frontoparietal regions implicated in attention and cognitive control.

    “The 'top-down' component of voluntary imagery is reflected in the involvement of frontoparietal regions implicated in attention and cognitive control”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 137 · Cited by 33

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bartolomeo P (2014) The attention systems of the human brain. In: Attention Disorders After Right Brain Damage, pp 1-19: Springer London.
  2. Bartolomeo P, Bourgeois A, Bourlon C, Migliaccio R (2013) Visual and motor mental imagery after brain damage. In: Multisensory Imagery (Lacey S, Lawson R, eds), pp 249-269. New York: Springer.
  3. Bergmann TO, Hartwigsen G (2020) Inferring Causality from Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience:1-29.
  4. Bisiach E, Luzzatti C, Perani D (1979) Unilateral neglect, representational schema and consciousness. Brain : a journal of neurology 102:609-618.

Authors
Spagna, A., Hajhajate, D., Liu, J., & Bartolomeo, P.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Bartolomeo, Paolo
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
122
Pages
201-217
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3101356042
Cited by
33
References
137
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (acceptedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-IAIHU06, 10-IAIHU-06, ANR-16, ANR-16-CE37-0005, ANR-10)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
visual imagery, early visual cortex, frontoparietal network, brain-damaged patients, temporal lobe lesions
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Temporal Lobe, Visual Cortex, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review