Heart rate variability and slow-paced breathing:when coherence meets resonance
Open accessAbstract
Clinical research on the beneficial effects induced by slow-paced breathing has been increasingly extended in the past twenty years. Improvements in cardiovascular functioning, executive functions, or stress management appear to be among the most prominent observations in these studies. However, the mechanisms underlying these effects are multiple and complex. This review will focus on the importance of reducing breathing rate at the resonant frequency (~ 0.1 Hz), which increases cardiac oscillations, thus reflecting improved vagally-mediated heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity. These effects are achieved through temporal coherence of respiratory, blood pressure, and cardiac phases, which are the origin of multiple peripheral benefits. In return, vagal afferents, which send inputs to interoceptive areas, are stimulated for longer and more intensely than when breathing spontaneously. In limbic areas, which may also be stimulated through larger cerebral blood flow oscillations and increases in oxygen delivery, interoceptive activation produces a cascade of neural activations that may be at the origin of the central benefits of deep and slow-paced breathing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stimulating the vagus nerve non-invasively represents a valid target for health-related issues.
“By considering the importance of the parasympathetic nervous system for health-related issues, stimulating non-invasively the vagus nerve represents a valid target (Gerritsen & Band, 2018; Schmaußer, Hoffmann, Raab, & Laborde, 2022; Sevoz-Couche & Laborde, 2022; Vanderhasselt & Ottaviani, 2022)”
From Effects of voluntary slow breathing on heart rate and heart rate variability: A systematic review and a meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Sevoz-Couche & Laborde, 2022
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 192 · Cited by 195
- Authors
- Sevoz-Couche, C., & Laborde, S.
- Affiliations
- German Sport University Cologne (DE)
- ORCID
- Laborde, Sylvain
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 135
- Pages
- 104576
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4211102059
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 192
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 19
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 500 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Keywords
- slow-paced breathing, heart rate variability, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, vagal afferents, baroreflex sensitivity, interoception, oxygen delivery, stress management, executive function, cardiovascular function
- MeSH terms
- Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, Humans, Respiration, Vagus Nerve, Baroreflex, Respiratory Rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review