The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a unique method for non-invasive brain imaging. The fundamental difference between TMS and other available non-invasive brain imaging techniques is that when a physiological response is evoked by stimulation of a cortical area, that specific cortical area is causally related to the response. With other imaging methods, it is only possible to detect and map a brain area that participates in a given task or reaction. TMS has been shown to be clinically accurate and effective in mapping cortical motor areas and applicable to the functional assessment of motor tracts following stroke, for example. Many hundreds of studies have been published indicating that repetitive TMS (rTMS) may also have multiple therapeutic applications. Techniques and protocols for individually targeting and dosing rTMS urgently need to be developed in order to ascertain the accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility required of TMS in clinical applications. We review the basic concepts behind navigated TMS and evaluate the currently accepted physical and physiological factors contributing to the accuracy and reproducibility of navigated TMS. The advantages of navigated TMS over functional MRI in motor cortex mapping are briefly discussed. Illustrative cases utilizing navigated TMS are shown in presurgical mapping of the motor cortex, in therapy for depression, and in the follow-up of recovery from stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review
Ranck, J. B. (1975) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(75)90364-9 · Cited by 2,024
Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark
Yousry, T. (1997) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/120.1.141 · Cited by 1,837
Neural mechanisms underlying brain waves: from neural membranes to networks
Lopes da Silva, F. (1991) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(91)90044-5 · Cited by 1,112
Day, B. L., Dressler, D., Maertens de Noordhout, A., Marsden, C. D., Nakashima, K., Rothwell, J. C., & Thompson, P. D. (1989) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017626 · Cited by 931
The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee
Chen, R., Cros, D., Curra, A., Di Lazzaro, V., Lefaucheur, J.-P., Magistris, M. R., Mills, K., Rösler, K. M., Triggs, W. J., Ugawa, Y., et al. (2008) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.10.014 · Cited by 612
Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation
Mills, K. R., Boniface, S. J., & Schubert, M. (1992) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(92)90096-t · Cited by 502
Brasil-Neto, J. P., McShane, L. M., Fuhr, P., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1992) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(92)90095-s · Cited by 341
Amassian, V. E., Eberle, L., Maccabee, P. J., & Cracco, R. Q. (1992) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(92)90105-k · Cited by 240
Structure of the human sensorimotor system. I: Morphology and cytoarchitecture of the central sulcus
White, L. (1997) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/7.1.18 · Cited by 234
Column‐based model of electric field excitation of cerebral cortex
Fox, P. T., Narayana, S., Tandon, N., Sandoval, H., Fox, S. P., Kochunov, P., & Lancaster, J. L. (2004) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20006 · Cited by 230
Cited by
Rossini, P. M., Burke, D., Chen, R., Cohen, L. G., Daskalakis, Z., Di Iorio, R., Di Lazzaro, V., Ferreri, F., Fitzgerald, P. B., George, M. S., et al. (2015) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 · Cited by 2,753
Lefaucheur, J.-P., André-Obadia, N., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Cantello, R. M., Cincotta, M., de Carvalho, M., De Ridder, D., et al. (2014) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021 · Cited by 2,119
Rossi, S., Antal, A., Bestmann, S., Bikson, M., Brewer, C., Brockmöller, J., Carpenter, L. L., Cincotta, M., Chen, R., Daskalakis, J. D., et al. (2021) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003 · Cited by 1,573
Berlim, M. T., van den Eynde, F., Tovar-Perdomo, S., & Daskalakis, Z. J. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291713000512 · Cited by 620
Pell, G. S., Roth, Y., & Zangen, A. (2011) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.003 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruohonen, J., & Karhu, J.
- Venue
- Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-17
- ISSN
- 0987-7053 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078441972
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neucli.2010.01.006
- The paper
- Ruohonen, J., & Karhu, J. (2010). Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2010.01.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
