Incremental on-line learning: A review and comparison of state of the art algorithms
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing surveys on incremental learning methods are somewhat dated and lack in-depth analysis, especially for overcoming catastrophic forgetting.
“However, the existing researches are somewhat dated and lack in-depth (thorough) analysis especially for overcoming CF.”
From An Appraisal of Incremental Learning Methods (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 104 · Cited by 382
- Authors
- Losing, V., Hammer, B., & Wersing, H.
- Affiliations
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Honda (Germany) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Losing, Viktor
- Venue
- Neurocomputing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 275
- Pages
- 1261-1274
- ISSN
- 0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2758219826
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 19.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pub.uni-bielefeld.de
- Licence
- Locations
- Neurocomputing (publishedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- incremental learning, online learning, data streams, big data, online classification, hyperparameter optimization, algorithm comparison, convergence rate, model complexity, asymptotic behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review