The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of fully connected layers on performance of convolutional neural networks for image classification
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), in domains like computer vision, mostly reduced the need for handcrafted features due to its ability to learn the problem-specific features from the raw input data. However, the selection of dataset-specific CNN architecture, which mostly performed by either experience or expertise is a time-consuming and error-prone process. To automate the process of learning a CNN architecture, this paper attempts at finding the relationship between Fully Connected (FC) layers with some of the characteristics of the datasets. The CNN architectures, and recently datasets also, are categorized as deep, shallow, wide, etc. This paper tries to formalize these terms along with answering the following questions. (i) What is the impact of deeper/shallow architectures on the performance of the CNN w.r.t. FC layers?, (ii) How the deeper/wider datasets influence the performance of CNN w.r.t. FC layers?, and (iii) Which kind of architecture (deeper/shallower) is better suitable for which kind of (deeper/wider) datasets. To address these findings, we have performed experiments with four CNN architectures having different depths. The experiments are conducted by varying the number of FC layers. We used four widely used datasets including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Tiny ImageNet, and CRCHistoPhenotypes to justify our findings in the context of image classification problem. The source code of this work is available at https://github.com/shabbeersh/Impact-of-FC-layers .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Cited by
Activation functions in deep learning: a comprehensive survey and benchmark
Dubey, S. R., Singh, S. K., & Chaudhuri, B. B. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.111 · Cited by 1,259
Self-citationWalia, G. K., Kumar, M., & Gill, S. S. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3338015 · Cited by 279
EPlus-LLM: A large language model-based computing platform for automated building energy modeling
Jiang, G., Ma, Z., Zhang, L., & Chen, J. (2024) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123431 · Cited by 204
Melanoma detection using deep learning-based classifications
Alwakid, G., Gouda, W., Humayun, M., & Sama, N. U. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10122481 · Cited by 153
Tackling prediction uncertainty in machine learning for healthcare
Chua, M., Kim, D., Choi, J., Lee, N. G., Deshpande, V., Schwab, J., Lev, M. H., Gonzalez, R. G., Gee, M. S., & Do, S. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00988-x · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Basha, S. H. S., Dubey, S. R., Pulabaigari, V., & Mukherjee, S.
- Venue
- Neurocomputing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 378
- Pages
- 112-119
- ISSN
- 0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2913292019
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 19.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of fully connected layers on performance of convolutional neural networks for image classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.10.008
- The paper
- Basha, S. H. S., Dubey, S. R., Pulabaigari, V., & Mukherjee, S. (2020). Impact of fully connected layers on performance of convolutional neural networks for image classification. Neurocomputing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.10.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
